Re: WNPP bug overview

2001-11-18 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On 2007T204222+0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > - 88221 --> O: cvs2html (260 days old) This is wrong, since cvs2html is not orphaned. > The following errors were encountered: > - 68290: orphaned package "malaga" does not exist in archive It is a source package. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho

Re: WNPP bug overview

2001-11-18 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 05:32:22PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > My script can also automatically rename ITA's to O's and ITP's to RFP's. > Orphaned packages are to be removed after: > - 300 days (main, no RC bugs) > - 50 days (contrib, no RC bugs) > - 25 days (non-free, no RC

Re: WNPP bug overview

2001-11-18 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Anthony! You wrote: > > ITA's will be renamed to O's after 100 days > > RFA, YM? Not sure this is appropriate. Yeah, in the lastest version ITA's will be renamed to RFA's if the previous state was RFA, and to O otherwise. > > ITP's will be renamed to RFP's after 100 days > > Sounds

Re: WNPP bug overview

2001-11-18 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Aren't ITP's supposed to be wishlist, too? Ah, sorry, I was getting ITA and ITP confused. It'd be nice if there was some reasonable way for wnpp's "bugs" to be reduced regularly. From what I can see, there are three sorts of entry

Re: WNPP bug overview

2001-11-18 Thread Martin Schulze
Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi guys! > > I've written a script which generates overviews of the wnpp BTS entry. > An example of a report in included below. These reports should enable > us to clean out en keep healthy the wnpp bug entry. > If no one object, I am going to send weekly reports to debian

Re: WNPP bug overview

2001-11-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 18:21]: > The debian-devel-announce list may be more suited, with a > Mail-Followup-To set to debian-devel. Perhaps it should be integrated with the main wnpp report. Yet another weekly report to d-d-announce is probably not a good i

Bug#120123: kview takes very long to show images

2001-11-18 Thread Robert Voigt
Package: kview Version: 2.2.1.0-2.1 When I view several JPEG images (2048x1536 pixels, 1 MB), like a slide show, it takes 8 seconds from when I click "next image" before it actually shows the next image. This is not acceptable. With kview 2.1.1 it was only 3 seconds. Thank you

Re: WNPP bug overview

2001-11-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 09:21:59PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 18:21]: > > The debian-devel-announce list may be more suited, with a > > Mail-Followup-To set to debian-devel. > > Perhaps it should be integrated with