On 2007T204222+0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> - 88221 --> O: cvs2html (260 days old)
This is wrong, since cvs2html is not orphaned.
> The following errors were encountered:
> - 68290: orphaned package "malaga" does not exist in archive
It is a source package.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 05:32:22PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> My script can also automatically rename ITA's to O's and ITP's to RFP's.
> Orphaned packages are to be removed after:
> - 300 days (main, no RC bugs)
> - 50 days (contrib, no RC bugs)
> - 25 days (non-free, no RC
Hi Anthony!
You wrote:
> > ITA's will be renamed to O's after 100 days
>
> RFA, YM? Not sure this is appropriate.
Yeah, in the lastest version ITA's will be renamed to RFA's if the
previous state was RFA, and to O otherwise.
> > ITP's will be renamed to RFP's after 100 days
>
> Sounds
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Aren't ITP's supposed to be wishlist, too?
Ah, sorry, I was getting ITA and ITP confused.
It'd be nice if there was some reasonable way for wnpp's "bugs" to be
reduced regularly. From what I can see, there are three sorts of entry
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> I've written a script which generates overviews of the wnpp BTS entry.
> An example of a report in included below. These reports should enable
> us to clean out en keep healthy the wnpp bug entry.
> If no one object, I am going to send weekly reports to debian
* Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 18:21]:
> The debian-devel-announce list may be more suited, with a
> Mail-Followup-To set to debian-devel.
Perhaps it should be integrated with the main wnpp report. Yet
another weekly report to d-d-announce is probably not a good i
Package: kview
Version: 2.2.1.0-2.1
When I view several JPEG images (2048x1536 pixels, 1 MB), like a slide show,
it takes 8 seconds from when I click "next image" before it actually shows
the next image. This is not acceptable. With kview 2.1.1 it was only 3
seconds.
Thank you
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 09:21:59PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008 18:21]:
> > The debian-devel-announce list may be more suited, with a
> > Mail-Followup-To set to debian-devel.
>
> Perhaps it should be integrated with
8 matches
Mail list logo