Jeff Breidenbach writes:
> I think Debian can very reasonably go either way; package 2.5.0b2 or
> wait for 2.5.0. I guesstimate Earl will release 2.5.0 before 2002.
In any case, waiting for the stable release seems to me the more
reasonnable thing to do and moreover should be a guideline for
Package: mpg123
It seems like mpg123 can't convert mp3s to wave without opening
/dev/dsp:
$for f in *; do mpg123 $f -w ${f%%.mp3}.wav; done
High Performance MPEG 1.0/2.0/2.5 Audio Player for Layer 1, 2 and 3.
Version 0.59q (1999/Jan/26). Written and copyrights by Michael Hipp.
Uses code from va
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 11:40:43AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> Jeff Breidenbach writes:
> > I think Debian can very reasonably go either way; package 2.5.0b2 or
> > wait for 2.5.0. I guesstimate Earl will release 2.5.0 before 2002.
>
> In any case, waiting for the stable release seems to me t
>[what version to package] is clearly a judgement call for the
>maintainer.
Yes, I agree.
>I'll change [mhonarc's] state back to orphaned and see if anybody
>else is interested in it.
That is a truly excellent way to bring bug #113850 to a resolution.
Jeff
Hi Earl,
Folks at Debian (including me) are speculating as to when mhonarc
2.5.0 might be released and/or whether it makes any sense for Debian
to ship 2.5.0b2. The question is somewhat influenced by Debian's very
long release cycle which will roll over within a few months. So --
would you be in
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that's a very black-and-white view. Some things are less safe in
> beta than others: libraries are the standard example. On the other hand,
> I doubt that anyone cares that trn4, say, is still in beta; in practice
> it's probably never going to ge
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 11:43:45PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think that's a very black-and-white view. Some things are less safe in
> > beta than others: libraries are the standard example. On the other hand,
> > I doubt that anyone cares that trn4
Jeff Breidenbach writes:
> Hi Earl,
>
> Folks at Debian (including me) are speculating as to when mhonarc
> 2.5.0 might be released and/or whether it makes any sense for Debian
> to ship 2.5.0b2. The question is somewhat influenced by Debian's very
> long release cycle which will roll over withi
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was trying to say "it depends on the package", but maybe I wasn't
> clear enough about that. QA isn't a mechanical process that you can
> apply in the same way across the board.
I understood correctly that "it depends on the package". I only want
t
--- Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Folks at Debian (including me) are speculating as to when mhonarc
> 2.5.0 might be released and/or whether it makes any sense for Debian
> to ship 2.5.0b2. The question is somewhat influenced by Debian's very
> long release cycle which will roll over within a few mon
10 matches
Mail list logo
