Intend to NMU ALSA packages

2001-08-22 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, I intend to NMU ALSA packages since I've got the agreement from Masato Taruishi who has to more time to maintain his packages. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

New upload of dstooltk and dstooltk-doc

2001-08-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi, I've made an upload of dstooltk and dstooltk-doc to set the maintainer in the maintainer field to Debian QA and to fix a RC bug. cu Adrian -- Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400

dstooltk override disparity

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): dstooltk_2.0-4_i386.deb: section is overridden from math to science. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong plea

dstooltk-doc_2.0-3_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: dstooltk-doc_2.0-3_all.deb to pool/main/d/dstooltk-doc/dstooltk-doc_2.0-3_all.deb dstooltk-doc_2.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dstooltk-doc/dstooltk-doc_2.0-3.diff.gz dstooltk-doc_2.0-3.dsc to pool/main/d/dstooltk-doc/dstooltk-doc_2.0-3.dsc Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.d

Fixed in NMU of dstooltk 2.0-4

2001-08-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
tag 96034 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:07:30 +0200 Source: dstooltk Binary: dstooltk Architecture: source i386 Version

dstooltk_2.0-4_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: dstooltk_2.0-4.dsc to pool/main/d/dstooltk/dstooltk_2.0-4.dsc dstooltk_2.0-4.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dstooltk/dstooltk_2.0-4.tar.gz dstooltk_2.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dstooltk/dstooltk_2.0-4_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Setting bugs to severity f

dstooltk-doc override disparity

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): dstooltk-doc_2.0-3_all.deb: section is overridden from math to doc. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong pleas

Re: Fixed in NMU of dstooltk 2.0-4

2001-08-22 Thread James Troup
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tag 96034 + fixed > > quit > > This message was generated automatically in response to a > non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. Grr, can you guys please standardize on one Maintainer: line and stick to it? So far we have: o "Debian QA

Bug#95532: marked as done (Changes to @INC for 5.6.1 perl packages)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#93870: marked as done (Garbage characters appended to quik's kernel arguments)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#56835: marked as done (frad: NMU patches for alpha)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#51767: marked as done (ssh2: installation script runs through one question)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#86267: marked as done (epan uses /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#48971: marked as done (xcopilot: Obsolete documentation)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#26683: marked as done (xcopilot - mouse drags don't work in 0.6.6)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#104793: marked as done (Build failure on hppa (at least))

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#103550: marked as done (ncbi-tools6: build failure with gcc>=2.96)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#103340: marked as done (cooledit: config.guess and config.sub update required)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#107831: marked as done (xmhtml_1.1.7-6 fails to autobuild on m68k)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#15792: marked as done (ines is not libc6)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#24890: marked as done (xcopilot runs update-menus twice in postinst)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#21690: marked as done (postinst and postrm files include the update-menus command twice)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#29471: marked as done (ines: Segfaults under libc6, no longer maintained upstream)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#51601: marked as done (ssh2 does not forward X11 connections)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#32819: marked as done (frad: Fix for compilation with glibc2.1)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#94893: marked as done (xxgdb uses own dh_installxaw instead of debhelper one)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#91654: marked as done (Package sharc still has at least one file in /usr/doc)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#94463: marked as done (mhonarc: 2.4.8 out -- Debian unstable is two point releases behind)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#91065: marked as done (man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#91179: marked as done (man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#88776: marked as done (xcopilot: build on alpha fails)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#64367: marked as done (Xcopilot mouse drag patch)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#67960: marked as done (needs recompile to fix xpm4g dependancy)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#83516: marked as done (depends on obsolete package)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#51738: marked as done (ssh2 refuses ForwardX11)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#84921: marked as done (epan: uninstallable on woody (depends on libforms0.88))

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#52610: marked as done (ssh2: X11 forward not working)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#91491: marked as done (Package ines still has at least one file in /usr/doc)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#56777: marked as done (ssh2: ssh2 postinst creates broken man symlinks)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#93871: marked as done (Quik fails to build under glibc2.2)

2001-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:07:59 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line These bugs can be closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

MacGate doesn't work any more and upstream is not reachable

2001-08-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
reassign 82387 ftp.debian.org retitle 82387 Please remove macgate from unstable retitle 85261 Please remove macgate from unstable thanks Since MacGate seems to be no longer working and upstream is no longer reaschable for some years this package should be removed from unstable. TIA Adrian

Upload of ilu and krusader

2001-08-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi, I'll do in a few minutes an upload of ilu and krusader to set the maintainer in the maintainer field to Debian QA and to fix some bugs. cu Adrian -- Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400

Are YOU looking for a new website, develop an existing site, cheaper hosting or domain names?

2001-08-22 Thread Havealook at This
Are YOU looking for a new website, to develop an existing website, for cheaper hosting or domain names? We are a UK based company who would like to offer you our considerable experience and expertise in the field of website design, eCommerce, eTailing and search engine positioning. Domain name regi