Package: pclock
Version: 0.13-3
Severity: serious
This package build-depends on xpm4g-dev, which is no longer a package in
the current unstable archive. The functionality this packaged offered is
now provided by the xlibs-dev package. Depending on xlib6g-dev is the same
as depending on xlibs-dev
+0200
From: m68k build daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Log for failed build of knews_1.0b.1-5 (dist=unstable)
Automatic build of knews_1.0b.1-5 on q650 by sbuild 1.152
Build started at 2001040
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> weasel has added a page about "Stats on broken Depends, Oldlibs,
> Priorities etc." at http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php [ btw, the
> link to 'heavy' _is_ heavy. Give your browser a couple of minutes
> to render the page ]
Interesting, but not perfect yet. :-) It seems
Installing:
xpuzzles_5.5.3-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xpuzzles/xpuzzles_5.5.3-1.dsc
xpuzzles_5.5.3.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/xpuzzles/xpuzzles_5.5.3.orig.tar.gz
xpuzzles_5.5.3-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xpuzzles/xpuzzles_5.5.3-1.diff.gz
xpuzzles_5.5.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xpuzzles/xpuzzles_5
On Tue, 03 Apr 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > weasel has added a page about "Stats on broken Depends, Oldlibs,
> > Priorities etc." at http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php [ btw, the
> > link to 'heavy' _is_ heavy. Give your browser a couple of minutes
> > to render the page ]
Currently the signal/noise ratio on this list is really bad (if you
consider bug reports and dinstall messages as noise).
Maybe we should stop using <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a Maintainer:
address for packages maintained by QA and use somthing like
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
For now this should be setup t
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:38:29PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
> Package: pclock
> Version: 0.13-3
> Severity: serious
>
> This package build-depends on xpm4g-dev, which is no longer a package in
> the current unstable archive. The functionality this packaged offered is
> now provided by the xlibs-
7 matches
Mail list logo
