Re: RFC: Changing the NM system

Hi Mariusz! You wrote: > Don't worry. The current NM process is (almost) on hold. Uhm? What are you talking about? We are quite active, actually. -- Kind regards, +---+ | Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |

Re: RFC: Changing the NM system

On Friday 29 December 2000 10:05, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Mariusz! Hi Bas, > You wrote: > > Don't worry. The current NM process is (almost) on hold. > > Uhm? What are you talking about? We are quite active, actually. I really believe it. I only mean about "the final authority" and "the final

Re: Old bugs cleaning

Hi all, I've put a .png image in http://perso.wanadoo.es/larocha/debian/brs.png I suggest you to take and print it before continue reading. I've reading carefully answers to my post and I agree that an indiscriminate mailing may be counterproductive. So I've changed my mind and this are my idea

Processed: changing bug originator

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 68856 Bug#68856: lacks manpage or manpage 'undocumented' hook Bug#68880: iputils-ping doesn't contain manpages Bug#74375: iputils-ping: No man page Disconnected #68856 from all other report(s). > close 68856 Bug#68856: lacks manpage or manpage

libset-object-perl_1.02-3_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: libset-object-perl_1.02-3.dsc to pool/main/libs/libset-object-perl/libset-object-perl_1.02-3.dsc libset-object-perl_1.02-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libs/libset-object-perl/libset-object-perl_1.02-3_i386.deb libset-object-perl_1.02-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libs/libset-object-perl/libse

Bug#80704: marked as done (outdated perl dependency)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:57:11 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#80704: fixed in libset-object-perl 1.02-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it