grafix_1.6-1_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: grafix_1.6-1.dsc to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix_1.6-1.dsc grafix_1.6-1.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix_1.6-1.tar.gz grafix-dev_1.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix-dev_1.6-1_i386.deb grafix1_1.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix1_1.6-1_i386.deb Announcing to debi

Bug#44255: marked as done (this package is not native)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:54:56 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#44255: fixed in grafix 1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#50097: marked as done (grafix: does not compile from source)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:54:56 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#50097: fixed in grafix 1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#60796: marked as done (grafix contains doc in two places)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:54:56 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#60796: fixed in grafix 1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#62013: marked as done (bad /usr/doc/grafix/examples permissions)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:54:56 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#62013: fixed in grafix 1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#72221: marked as done (Error in file "window.h")

Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:54:56 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#72221: fixed in grafix 1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#74860: marked as done (grafix copyright problems)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2000 14:54:56 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#74860: fixed in grafix 1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#80553: tunnelv: build depends on essential package

Package: tunnelv Version: N/A Severity: important tunnelv build depends on libstdc++2.10-glibc2.1-dev, which is an essential package, and no longer exists (we're on glibc2.2 now). This build dependancy should be removed. -- System Information Debian Release: woody Kernel Version: Linux cyberhq 2

Bug#80554: tunnelv: missing build dependency

Package: tunnelv Version: N/A Severity: important tunnelv is missing a build dependency on debhelper -- System Information Debian Release: woody Kernel Version: Linux juice 2.2.17 #1 Tue Jul 18 17:51:27 PDT 2000 ppc unknown

Uploaded tunnelv 1.00-5 (source i386) to non-us

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:53:59 +0100 Source: tunnelv Binary: tunnelv Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.00-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description:

Bug#80573: should replace grafix

Package: grafix-dev Version: 1.6-1 Severity: normal or maybe conflict. dunno. anyway. here's log. 506 : archives\ > dpkg -i grafix-dev_1.6-1_i386.deb (Reading database ... 268303 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking grafix-dev (from grafix-dev_1.6-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error