hi all,
I am just trying to get the Bulletins function working and am having the
trouble that bulletins are not remembered to have been deleted, and I remember
reading something about this.
I have installed all the db2 librarys but am wondering if the package was
compiled with USE_DB?
Thanks,
A
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 01:41:54PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2000, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
> > without being a maintainer" and everything comes to a halt. The
> > goals I stated for joining Debian includes: work on the Chinese
> > translation of w.d.o and help with QA work for Chinese-spe
* Michael Moerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001219 01:30]:
> I have tried to talk to Brian Bassett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> directly
> several times by email. The first email was sent at least 2 months
> ago. The second was sent over than 1 month ago and since I have
> sent th
qftp has 2 outstanding important bugs listed above. One is almost a
year old the other is over 3 months. It appears the developer is rather
busy. I took the liberty of addressing 71484 with a patch to the BTS.
If one of the DD's here would apply it and recompile, both bugs could
be closed.
Thanks
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> I'd also send a message to debian-devel asking if anyone knows where
> he is.
>
Yeah, I'll do that. Thanx.
--
kind regards,
Michael Moerz
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:39:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 9menu: Unable to execute prerm or postinst
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:39:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 9menu: Unable to execute prerm or postinst
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Installing:
lockvc_3.9-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/lockvc/lockvc_3.9-2_i386.deb
lockvc_3.9-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/lockvc/lockvc_3.9-2.diff.gz
lockvc_3.9-2.dsc
to pool/main/l/lockvc/lockvc_3.9-2.dsc
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 79677
If the override fil
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:02:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#79677: fixed in lockvc 3.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Installing:
xwpe_1.5.25a-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xwpe/xwpe_1.5.25a-1_i386.deb
xwpe_1.5.25a.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/xwpe/xwpe_1.5.25a.orig.tar.gz
xwpe_1.5.25a-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xwpe/xwpe_1.5.25a-1.dsc
xwpe_1.5.25a-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xwpe/xwpe_1.5.25a-1.diff.gz
Announcing to de
I'd like to change the way WNPP bugs have to be reported slighlty.
Currently, the WNPP pages (the authority) suggest to send mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Developer's Reference suggests filing a
bug _and_ sending a copy to debian-devel.
I think it makes send to send a copy to debian-devel. Howev
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:14:21AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'd like to change the way WNPP bugs have to be reported slighlty.
You might want to CC: the WNPP maintainers when talking about their stuff...
> Currently, the WNPP pages (the authority) suggest to send mail
> to [EMAIL PROTECTE
12 matches
Mail list logo
