Bug#62895: marked as done (hwtools should suggest, not recommend, scsitools)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2000 01:50:48 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#62895: hwtools should suggest, not recommend, scsitools has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Re: Bug#23397: SCSI tools bugs

hmm. I should look for other stuff that is mine and marked as orphaned. On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:54:01AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > The hwtools package is properly marked as orphaned, i.e. maintained by > > > the QA group. > > > > Ok. I will

Removal of xirc

Hi, I've sent bug #62575 on xirc. This bug says xirc has to be removed from Debian because it is released under the GPL but linked with QT. xirc was orphaned 516 days ago by Igor Grobman (according to http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html ). Am I allowed to reassign this bug to ftp.

Re: Removal of xirc

Adrian Bunk wrote: > Hi, > > I've sent bug #62575 on xirc. This bug says xirc has to be removed from > Debian because it is released under the GPL but linked with QT. xirc was > orphaned 516 days ago by Igor Grobman (according to > http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-packages.html ). Am I allow

Re: Removal of xirc

On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Martin Schulze wrote: > > I've sent bug #62575 on xirc. This bug says xirc has to be removed from > > Debian because it is released under the GPL but linked with QT. xirc was > > orphaned 516 days ago by Igor Grobman (according to > > http://www.debian.org/doc/prospective-pac

Intent to Give to Others (ITGTO?): libnewt-perl

Hello, I would like to announce my intent to give the package "libnewt-perl" to whomever is interested in maintaining it. I am no longer qualified, for the following reasons: * libnewt-perl is still based on newt-0.30, but it seems upstream had not updated it to use with the current newt-0.