Is Jon Rabone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) still developing for Debian? The last upload
of the acs package was January 1997 and there are some other very old
bug reports, so I assume not.
The upstream author of acs has asked me to adopt acs since the Debian
package is so old, so I will (if there are no ob
Hi,
From: Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Q] mmm & ocamltk with Tcl/Tk 8.2
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 18:28:36 +0100
mquinson> You should maybe try to contact the caml mailling list :
mquinson> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mquinson> (even if a Tk place could be better)
Thanks for suggestion.
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
> However, I disagree with the thought process which suggests that Net::SMTP
> is in any way a replacement for sendmail. The semantics are totally
> different (sendmail queues while Net::SMTP does not).
I think Net::SMTP should be used in all cases. Wheth
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
> > However, I disagree with the thought process which suggests that Net::SMTP
> > is in any way a replacement for sendmail. The semantics are totally
> > different (sendmail queues while Net::SMTP does not).
On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 02:06:26AM -0400, Mike B
On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
> What is the advantage of introducing a complex syntax which is not
> robust?
In my opinion, using Net::SMTP as I outlined is at least as robust as
invoking Sendmail directly, and provides several improvements.
1. There is no need to have any mail system
5 matches
Mail list logo
