Bugs in textutils

Hi Galen, When going through the release critical bugs list I noticed that your "textutils" package has a lot of open bugs. As it is part of the base system I think we should get that straightened out. There are many bugs which are very old on the list so it seems you do not currently have the

Unexpected behaviour of tsort

Hi textutils developers, I am writing to you because we (Debian) got a release critical bug against our textutils package. It seems that tsort does not behave as most people would expect. Note: I am not the maintainer of that package but a member of the Quality Assurance team. As the behaviou

Re: Unexpected behaviour of tsort

Thanks for the report. This will be fixed in the textutils, eventually. I don't have time right now. I'll gladly consider patches. Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi textutils developers, | | I am writing to you because we (Debian) got a release critical bug | against our textuti

Re: Asking for NMU

> Hi there, Hi Masayuki, > Christophe(thanks!) expressed his intention to orphan the mmm package. > I've already made packages based on the latest MMM and OCamlTK > experimentally, but since I'm not an official maintainer, I can't > upload it by myself. So I'd like to ask someone to NMU it

forwarded message from Matthew Vernon

Ops. Messed up the Cc. --- start of forwarded message --- MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 "20 Minutes to Nikko" XEmacs Lucid (patch 2) From: Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PRO

release critical bugs of grace

Hi Torsten :-) > I have debianized the newest available version of grace which should fix > most of the bugs mentioned in the BTS. I have contacted the maintainer > Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> but he did not respond. Since I am > not an official developer I cannot upload the package. Can

Your offer regarding bug #28704

Hi Adam, Quoting your bugreport at http://bugs.debian.org/28704: > I volunteer to do NMUs for SGML packages to help the transition... Would you indeed do this? I would like to do it but I have no knowledge of SGML and do not use the packages. I think it should be done by somebody how uses it. I

Your NMU of diald

Hi Daniel, I gathered you uploaded a new version of diald to potato. Thanks for that. I would like to request you to update the BTS according to your upload, e.g. mark the bugs which the NMU resolved as fixed. If you don't have the time I will do it in a few days but I do not use diald so I had

Please update the BTS

close 35002 thanks Hi Tyson, I just wanted to recompile you xmhtml1-dev package against the current potato because you did not answer to bug #35002. As I noticed you have long uploaded a new version of the package which fixes the bug. Please don't forget to update the BTS when you upload your

Re: release critical bugs of grace

On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:13:59PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: [#42115 grace & xmgr conflict] > upstream. Even worse the new grace does not conflict but replace the xmgr > package. Did you try if that is okay if you have both installed? Grace is a more up to date version of xmgr with a name

Re: Your offer regarding bug #28704

[please retain CC to bts] >Quoting your bugreport at http://bugs.debian.org/28704: > >> I volunteer to do NMUs for SGML packages to help the transition... >Would you indeed do this? I would like to do it but I have no >knowledge of SGML and do not use the packages. I think it should be >done by

Internal projects

Hi, Should we join people like the XSF in having a link from teh Internal projects page of the website? Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org/

Re: gpg-rsaidea NMU?

On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 07:10:53PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > I have version 2.1 of gpg-rsaidea package ready, which fixes all > outstanding bugs against gpg-rsa and gpg-idea packages, making them > actually usable, and completely Policy compliant. > > The ("Severity: grave", IMHO) bug about unr

Re: release critical bugs of grace

Hello, On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:13:59PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > * new upstream, closes: #41146, #42115, #27308, #28944, #29705, #38214 > > Funny. 42115 is "grace should conflict with xmgr". This can't be fixed > by a new upstream. OK, that is the wrong explanation. I will probably