Martin Schulze wrote:
> People who work on QA are:
>
> . Vincent
> . James
> . Torsten Landschoff
> . Christian Kurz
> . myself
> . Josip Rodin, future
. Joey Hess
--
see shy jo
On Sunday 28 March 1999, at 21 h 48, the keyboard of Martin Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Mailing to Debian Development and Debian QA, please send replies
> *only* to Debian QA ]
As you wish but please CC: me, I'm not on debian-qa.
> What is debian-qa and is it eatable?
I agree wit
On Monday 29 March 1999, at 1 h 17, the keyboard of Adam Di Carlo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * check that patches that should be sent upstream are being sent
> upstream -- I think this is very important and I think we have a
> bit of a bad reputation on this count.
Could you elaborat
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > What is debian-qa and is it eatable?
>
> I agree with Adam that the goals seem very broad. Reading your message, one
> could think that Debian-QA is everything in Debian. Is QA really the
> technical
> direction of Debian or is it more a "sweeper" checking package
On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Maintainers:
>
> How much work is expected from the maintainers?
Can we refrain from formalising this too much? Personally, I quite like the
way this works at the moment -- if there's a buggy package that you can fix,
On Monday 29 March 1999, at 11 h 32, the keyboard of Martin Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh well, sure it is. But developers behave different. Some of them
> follow each policy change and each suggestion at once, some others
> are waiting until lintian tells them what to do, some are wa
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Monday 29 March 1999, at 11 h 32, the keyboard of Martin Schulze
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Oh well, sure it is. But developers behave different. Some of them
> > follow each policy change and each suggestion at once, some others
> > are waiting until lin
On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 11:55:58PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > How can one participate in this 'quality assurance'? I found some
>
> At the moment there is no written list of active members. However
> membership as uploader is limited to registrated developers while
> membership as reporter
On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 11:13:43PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Re-upload the known orphaned packages with the 'Maintainer' field
> > > set to: "Orphaned Package "
> >
> > I've seen only 'Debian QA Group' (and variations) in Maintainer: fields
> > so far - isn't that more suitable? Users
On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 03:01:12PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > The tech committee has a private group debian-ctte-private.
>
> When I became a maintainer I heard only of one private list (which I was
> subscribed on), debian-private. Why isn't that address written somewhere?
Sorry, I was wrong.
On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 02:46:59PM -0600, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> > Now that several new maintainers mentioned QA or QA-like work in their
> > new-maintainers application I'd like to invite people to work on QA
> > for Debian. This doesn't need a fully fledged developer but also
> > people who can o
> "Stephane" == Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephane> On Monday 29 March 1999, at 1 h 17, the keyboard of Adam Di
Stephane> Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * check that patches that should be sent upstream are being sent
>> upstream -- I think this is very important a
Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > BTW what can we do with maintainers who can't be reached by e-mails,
> > > and their packages need attention? How can we know that they will/won't
> >
> > Please take a look at debian-policy where I've posted the 2nd half of
> > Vincent's proposal. The QA team need to be
Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Re-upload the known orphaned packages with the 'Maintainer' field
> > set to: "Orphaned Package "
>
> We're currently using "Maintainer: Debian QA Group
> "
>
> I forget whatever log-ago discussion requted in that exact string, but it is
> already
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Maintainers:
> >
> > How much work is expected from the maintainers?
>
> Can we refrain from formalising this too much? Personally, I quite like the
> way this works at the moment -- if there'
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Re-upload the known orphaned packages with the 'Maintainer' field
> > > set to: "Orphaned Package "
> >
> > We're currently using "Maintainer: Debian QA Group
> > "
> >
> > I forget whatever log-ago discussion requted i
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Monday 29 March 1999, at 1 h 17, the keyboard of Adam Di Carlo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * check that patches that should be sent upstream are being sent
> > upstream -- I think this is very important and I think we have a
> > bit of a bad reputa
On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 10:09:35PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > People who work on QA are:
> >
> > . Vincent
> > . James
> > . Torsten Landschoff
> > . Christian Kurz
> > . myself
> > . Josip Rodin, future
> . Joey Hess
I work on the odd orphaned package occ
18 matches
Mail list logo
