On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 03:44:25PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> You should be able to manually invoke /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/apt/update
> (it is shell script) instead of letting dselect do this, but I cannot
> see the point. "dselect update"'s single purpose is to keep
> /var/lib/dpkg/availab
On 2004-05-16 Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 07:14:37AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> > You have not run dselect on this machine since it was upgraded from
> > stable to testing. - "apt-get upgrade" does not update
> > /var/lib/dpkg/available, type "dselect
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 07:14:37AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> You have not run dselect on this machine since it was upgraded from
> stable to testing. - "apt-get upgrade" does not update
> /var/lib/dpkg/available, type "dselect update" instead, if you wannt
> to play with grep-available.
T
On 2004-05-15 Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> My understanding is the available file is made from the downloaded Packages
> files.
> If you look at the binary package yiff-server, the version in stable seems
> to be higher than the unstable version (and I can&
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 03:18:20AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> $ apt-cache policy yiff-server
> yiff-server:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 2.12.4-6
> Version Table:
> 2.14.2-2 0
> 1 http://localhost unstable/main Packages
>
e available file is made from the downloaded Packages
> files.
>
> If you look at the binary package yiff-server, the version in stable seems
> to be higher than the unstable version (and I can't see any evidence of an
> epoch). If I do a grep-available, the version returned from
Hi,
I'm having a bit of a brain haemorrhage here...
I've got a machine with only testing in it's sources.list for binary
packages, and unstable for source packages.
My understanding is the available file is made from the downloaded Packages
files.
If you look at the binary pack
7 matches
Mail list logo
