Re: wnpplint

2001-06-29 Thread Colin Watson
Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:55:20PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> Hmm, I'd actually prefer patches against wnpp-lint (pandora: >> /org/qa.debian.org/data/wnpp/). > >Hm, OK. I didn't know of wnpp-lint. > >Pandora is listed as 'Access: developers only' on >h

Re: wnpplint

2001-06-28 Thread Uwe Hermann
Hi Martin, On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:55:20PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Hmm, I'd actually prefer patches against wnpp-lint (pandora: > /org/qa.debian.org/data/wnpp/). Hm, OK. I didn't know of wnpp-lint. Pandora is listed as 'Access: developers only' on http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?ho

Re: wnpplint

2001-06-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 19:59]: > I have written a small Perl script called wnpplint which checks the > Debian WNPP system (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) for > inconsistencies and errors. > The script can be downloaded from > http://www.her

wnpplint

2001-06-28 Thread Uwe Hermann
Hi everyone. I have written a small Perl script called wnpplint which checks the Debian WNPP system (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) for inconsistencies and errors. Currently it parses a file and outputs a list of bugs which seem to have a wrong subject line (i.e. *not* like this: