Re: weblint probably isn't worth adopting

2004-08-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 184363 ftp.debian.org retitle 184363 Please remove weblint thanks * Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-28 00:03]: > >I think this package should instead be removed from the archive. > > I agree. Procedure in this case is to file a bug in the BTS against the No, it's not - t

Re: weblint probably isn't worth adopting

2004-08-28 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Russ Allbery wrote: >I think this package should instead be removed from the archive. I agree. Procedure in this case is to file a bug in the BTS against the pseudo-package ftp.debian.org titled "Please remove weblint from unstable", and to note there that this is a request of QA, that the pack

weblint probably isn't worth adopting

2004-08-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Following up as requested in recent discussion in debian-devel: There isn't a lot *wrong* with the current weblint package (no RC bugs or the like). However, it only supports HTML 4, there is no upstream at all (upstream cannot be contacted and their domain has expired), there's no active develop