Re: upstream bug fixes to procps

1999-04-19 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
>> BTW, it is highly likely that your /bin/kill program is in violation >> of the appropriate standards. I supply an alternative with procps that >> you might want to consider using instead. > > Debian uses /bin/kill from our BSD utilities package (bsdutils) [1]. > If you would be kind to provide d

Re: upstream bug fixes to procps

1999-04-18 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Apr 18, 1999 at 12:13:16AM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > I'm the author of the "ps" program. I notice that your procps maintainer > does not seem to get email that I send. (he may be busy -- I don't know) > There have been many fixes to the procps package, but you still seem to > have a

Re: upstream bug fixes to procps

1999-04-18 Thread Anthony Towns
(Craig, procps.deb maintainer cc'ed) Hi Albert, According to the latest changelog (upstream: 2.0.0; debian version: 2), about half of these bugs are fixed, albeit not actually closed. On Sun, Apr 18, 1999 at 12:13:16AM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > -- debian bug list ---

upstream bug fixes to procps

1999-04-18 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
I'm the author of the "ps" program. I notice that your procps maintainer does not seem to get email that I send. (he may be busy -- I don't know) There have been many fixes to the procps package, but you still seem to have a buggy old version according to the bug database you have on the web. I a