Dear QA,
Please remove the tkchooser package from Debian.
* First removal request in 2004:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/12/msg00018.html
* An important bug (#160136) is open for 5 years and 183 days.
* The Standards-Version is old (3.7.3 instead of 3.5.9.0)
* Upstream is abandoned
It's been half a year since my email to debian-qa about the removal of
tkchooser. It's still not fixed.
The original message:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/12/msg00018.html
I can't find the tkchooser package on popcon so I doubt if it is
actually used.
http://popcon.de
On Mon, May 9, 2005 at 12:07:17 +0200 (+0200), Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:13:21AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > TkChooser is still broken. It is broken for quite a while and it was
> > reported to qa last december.
>
> What specifica
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:13:21AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> TkChooser is still broken. It is broken for quite a while and it was
> reported to qa last december.
What specifically is broken in this package? Please do file an RC bug
outlining why the package is too broken to be in sa
TkChooser is still broken. It is broken for quite a while and it was reported to
qa last december.
Lintian report: (8 Warnings)
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/mAdrian_Bridgett.html#tkchooser
Report:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/12/msg00018.html
QA Page:
http
Daniel van Eeden:
> On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 15:29 +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
> > After a while without any activity from maintainer it
> > should be orphaned and after a while again it could removed.
> Who should I contact to get it orphaned or removed?
>
According
http://www.debian.org/doc/developer
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 15:29 +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
> After a while without any activity from maintainer it
> should be orphaned and after a while again it could removed.
Who should I contact to get it orphaned or removed?
--
Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Daniel van Eeden:
> I noticed that the tkchooser package didn't have any fixes for a while.
> I personally think that it should either be fixed or removed.
>
Tkchooser seems like a dead project, last upstream version
nearly 5 years old and this is still packed.
> The buglist
I noticed that the tkchooser package didn't have any fixes for a while.
I personally think that it should either be fixed or removed.
The buglist of the maintainer of tkchooser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is
quite long and does have many old bugs and a couple of NMU's. It doesn't
have an
9 matches
Mail list logo