reassign 209213 ftp.debian.org
retitle 209213 Please remove rexxtk
reassign 198314 ftp.debian.org
retitle 198314 Please remove rxsock
thanks
* Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-22 07:57]:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-21 16:32]:
> > > > should we r
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-21 16:32]:
> > > should we remove rexxtk and rxsock?
> > >
> > > Rick, the previous maintainer, said in #253206 that there is no big
> > > interest in rexxtk, I don't know about rxsock.
> > > Rick, what's your opinion?
> >
> >
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Well, they're orphaned so people had enough time. Hmm, it seems
> searchscripts depends on rxsock, o if we install rxsock now this
> package will be uninstallable. Can we remove searchscripts as well?
Judging from the package description the functionality seems to
be pr
* Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-21 16:32]:
> > should we remove rexxtk and rxsock?
> >
> > Rick, the previous maintainer, said in #253206 that there is no big
> > interest in rexxtk, I don't know about rxsock.
> > Rick, what's your opinion?
>
> I think rxsock will be missed but there
Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> Hi,
> should we remove rexxtk and rxsock?
>
> Rick, the previous maintainer, said in #253206 that there is no big
> interest in rexxtk, I don't know about rxsock.
> Rick, what's your opinion?
Hi,
I think rxsock will be missed but there wasn't enough interest
for a new ma
Hi,
should we remove rexxtk and rxsock?
Rick, the previous maintainer, said in #253206 that there is no big
interest in rexxtk, I don't know about rxsock.
Rick, what's your opinion?
RC bugs, last upload in 2001, both for rexxtk and rxsock.
ciao,
ema
--
Questo รจ il domani di cui ti preo
6 matches
Mail list logo
