On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 12:17:48AM +0200, Sven Wick wrote:
> would you sponsor it another time?
Of course :)
Though it's probably better if next time (starting with the next email,
I'm still keeping it here to publicly ack the mail) we don't bother
debian-qa@ for this, as it has nothing to do wit
Hi Matthia,
would you sponsor it another time?
I uploaded a new package version to mentors
which closes an old Debian Bug ( #684394 )
This time I build the package without -sa
because dput mentioned it was not a good idead to upload the orig
tarball again.
On mentors there are 2 warnings now wh
On 02/26/2018 11:34 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
And uploaded!
Thanks for saving the package
and helping me getting it into a better shape
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:20:58PM +0100, Sven Wick wrote:
> On 02/26/2018 08:36 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >
> > > > Also, what you uploaded as recutils_1.7.orig.tar.gz.asc is not not a
> > > > detached signature (as it should be), but a public key export.
> > This is still not correct.
> >
>
On 02/26/2018 08:36 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Also, what you uploaded as recutils_1.7.orig.tar.gz.asc is not not a
detached signature (as it should be), but a public key export.
This is still not correct.
Better now?
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 05:10:55PM +0100, Sven Wick wrote:
> On 02/25/2018 12:39 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >
> > > > * please rename d/docs to a name that is clear what it's doing (I'm
> > > > positive you don't even realize what's is instaling *where*)
> > you've removed it, is that what yo
On 02/25/2018 12:39 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
* please rename d/docs to a name that is clear what it's doing (I'm
positive you don't even realize what's is instaling *where*)
you've removed it, is that what you want?
As far as I know d/docs gets installed into the first binary package
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:27:15AM +0100, Sven Wick wrote:
> > I'm afraid I'm going to ask for a bunch of things :)
> No need to be afraid - it's done :-)
thanks,
> > * please rename d/docs to a name that is clear what it's doing (I'm
> >positive you don't even realize what's is instaling *wh
> I'm afraid I'm going to ask for a bunch of things :)
No need to be afraid - it's done :-)
On 02/24/2018 05:29 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 03:26:43PM +0100, Sven Wick wrote:
Would you sponsor this precious little package?
I'm afraid I'm going to ask for a bunch of thin
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 03:26:43PM +0100, Sven Wick wrote:
> Would you sponsor this precious little package?
I'm afraid I'm going to ask for a bunch of things :)
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/recutils/recutils_1.7-2.dsc
* compat level 9 (which you already use) doesn't need expl
Hi Mattia,
thanks for the quick reply.
I changed Build-Depends to libglib2.0-dev instead.
Would you sponsor this precious little package?
https://mentors.debian.net/package/recutils
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/recutils/recutils_1.7-2.dsc
Would be great.
Cheers,
Sven
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:43:43AM +0100, Sven Wick wrote:
> I got this mail that the package "recutils"
> is marked for autoremoval but I don't understand why.
>
> On 02/20/2018 05:39 AM, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote:
> > recutils 1.7-1.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-0
Hi guys,
I got this mail that the package "recutils"
is marked for autoremoval but I don't understand why.
https://packages.debian.org/recutils
It Build-Depends on "mdbtools-dev" but I don't see
the connection to "mdbtools-gmdb" or "libgnomeui"
There were never any GUI apps or libraries instal
13 matches
Mail list logo
