Re: lirc package maintenance

2001-04-21 Thread Manuel Estrada Sainz
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:28:10PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010417 08:04]: > > > I am currently woking in the lirc project and need up to date lirc > > > packages, as Tom Lees > > > > How long has Tom been MIA? Has he expressed an interest in continuin

Re: lirc package maintenance

2001-04-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010417 08:04]: > > I am currently woking in the lirc project and need up to date lirc > > packages, as Tom Lees > > How long has Tom been MIA? Has he expressed an interest in continuing to > maintain the package? Well, strictly speaking, he's not MIA. He res

RE: lirc package maintenance

2001-04-18 Thread Carlos Laviola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17-Apr-2001 Manuel Estrada Sainz wrote: > Hello all, > > I am currently woking in the lirc project and need up to date lirc > packages, as Tom Lees is somewhat MIA Martin Michlmayr sujested taking > the packages from him. That means I can orphan

Re: lirc package maintenance

2001-04-17 Thread Edward Betts
Manuel Estrada Sainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am currently woking in the lirc project and need up to date lirc > packages, as Tom Lees is somewhat MIA Martin Michlmayr sujested taking > the packages from him. > > Then what should I do: > > 1) NMU: even though policy talks agains NMU's maki

lirc package maintenance

2001-04-16 Thread Manuel Estrada Sainz
Hello all, I am currently woking in the lirc project and need up to date lirc packages, as Tom Lees is somewhat MIA Martin Michlmayr sujested taking the packages from him. Then what should I do: 1) NMU: even though policy talks agains NMU's making big changes? 2) Adopt the package (what if Tom