Re: libmng possibly in need of orphaning

2004-10-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 05:56:05PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 09:24:15AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > >For the record: the PTS says that 1.0.8-1 has been uploaded to Unstable, > >presumably by the maintainer. > > It FTBFS on powerpc. See: > > http://buildd

Re: libmng possibly in need of orphaning

2004-10-01 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [Sat, 02 Oct 2004 06:36:18 +1000]: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 12:45:07PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote: > >libmng 1.0.8-1 builds fine for me on powerpc. I wonder if the build > >error on voltaire is transient or not. In any case, I can upload a > >local build if needed. > Ple

Re: libmng possibly in need of orphaning

2004-10-01 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 12:45:07PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote: >libmng 1.0.8-1 builds fine for me on powerpc. I wonder if the build >error on voltaire is transient or not. In any case, I can upload a >local build if needed. Please do so and close #274334 when you upload it. Anibal Monsalve Salaza

Re: libmng possibly in need of orphaning

2004-10-01 Thread Graham Wilson
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 05:56:05PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 09:24:15AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > >For the record: the PTS says that 1.0.8-1 has been uploaded to Unstable, > >presumably by the maintainer. > > It FTBFS on powerpc. See: > > http://buildd

Re: libmng possibly in need of orphaning

2004-10-01 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 05:56:05PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > It FTBFS on powerpc. See: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=libmng&ver=1.0.8-1&arch=powerpc&stamp=1096518953&file=log&as=raw Please file a bug instead. As you've seen in my latest mail in the thread[1], this issu

Re: libmng possibly in need of orphaning

2004-10-01 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 09:24:15AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: >Hi, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: >>On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 02:53:59AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >>>The libmng package has not seen an upload since April 2003. [...] >>>It looks like this package is in serious need of orphaning.

Re: libmng possibly in need of orphaning

2004-10-01 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 09:24:15AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > For the record: the PTS says that 1.0.8-1 has been uploaded to Unstable, > presumably by the maintainer. Yeah, after a polite reminder, he set himself quite actively to maintaining his packages again, and actively harrassing (in a

Re: libmng possibly in need of orphaning

2004-10-01 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 02:53:59AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >> The libmng package has not seen an upload since April 2003. [...] >> It looks like this package is in serious need of orphaning. Can someone >> in QA confirm this to their satisfaction and orphan

Re: libmng possibly in need of orphaning

2004-09-25 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 02:53:59AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > The libmng package has not seen an upload since April 2003. The > maintainer of record is not a DD. A four-month-old request for the new > upstream version has just been escalated to grave, because it appears to > include various i

libmng possibly in need of orphaning

2004-09-25 Thread Steve Langasek
The libmng package has not seen an upload since April 2003. The maintainer of record is not a DD. A four-month-old request for the new upstream version has just been escalated to grave, because it appears to include various important security fixes. It looks like this package is in serious need