Bug#797064: unusuable with current kernels, remove vserver packages from sid?

2015-08-27 Thread Holger Levsen
package: util-vserver, vserver-debiantools severity: important x-debbugs-cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org Hi, both util-vserver as well as vserver-debiantools are unusuable with current kernels as upstream only supports up to linux 3.18.7, so I wonder if actually util-vserver and vserver

CIPE is abandoned upstream, icompatible with all unstable kernels, low popcon and obsoleted by openvpn

2007-06-15 Thread Marco Nenciarini
Package: cipe-source Severity: grave The cipe-source does works with any kernel supported by debian. The latest upstream version (1.6.0) does not works too (last code update was January 2002 because developer themself gave up the project since cipe has no real reason to continue) OpenVPN is more

about kernels

2004-02-17 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
That's for your information. Matt Z. also said he has in his own TODO list the removing of kernels with security issues before sarge releasing. - Forwarded message from Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:01:38

Re: kernels

2004-02-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
10 hm, have to leave > > > 04:10 I'll check this out later > > > > So what are we doing about this? Are you going to look into it, shall I? > > At this point we should remove at least all kernels 2.2.x x<25, 2.4.x x<24 > and 2.6.x x<2 from

Re: Time to remove a few test kernels?

2004-02-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
s, and 2.6.1 isn't in Debian yet. > > > > Good point: security. We have a lots of dangerous pre-2.4.24 kernels > around too. Some of them are present for compatibilty on exotic > :) archs, but we have a good deal of old kernels for more conventional > ones too (i.e.

Re: Time to remove a few test kernels?

2004-02-09 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:37:30AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was updated for 2.6.0 some time ago. > Of course, 2.6.0 has known security problems, and 2.6.1 isn't in Debian yet. > Good point: security. We have a lots of dangerous p

Re: Time to remove a few test kernels?

2004-02-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:48:24AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:37:30AM -0800, you wrote: >> The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was updated for 2.6.0 some time >> ago. >> Of course, 2.6.0 has known security problems, and 2.6.1 isn't in Debian >> yet. > > Which is

Re: Time to remove a few test kernels?

2004-02-09 Thread Michael Stone
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:37:30AM -0800, you wrote: The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was updated for 2.6.0 some time ago. Of course, 2.6.0 has known security problems, and 2.6.1 isn't in Debian yet. Which is fine, since 2.6.2 is out :) Mike Stone

Re: Time to remove a few test kernels?

2004-02-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:51:26AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > The following patches apply to test kernels, they probably need updates for a > current one. > > kernel-patch-evms - Enterprise Volume Management System (kernel patches) The description lies; kernel-pa

Time to remove a few test kernels?

2004-02-09 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
There are a few obsolete kernels/patches of 2.6, such as (i386 only): kernel-doc-2.6.0-test11 - Linux kernel specific documentation for version 2.6.0-test11. kernel-doc-2.6.0-test9 - Linux kernel specific documentation for version 2.6.0-test9. kernel-headers-2.6.0-test11-1 - Header files