On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:57:23AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > You're right, but you certainly shouldn't do uploads just for the sake
> > of changing the maintainer field. Fix the maintainer field with other
> > bugs (or lintian warnings or update to the latest policy) and then it's
> >
* Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020103 11:45]:
> Hmm, maybe lintian should warn for wrong QA maintainer addresses.
There's a bug filed about this already (#126687).
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:57:23AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > You're right, but you certainly shouldn't do uploads just for the sake
> > of changing the maintainer field. Fix the maintainer field with other
> > bugs (or lintian warnings or update to the latest policy) and then it's
> >
Hi Thomas!
You wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] was the right address some months ago ... the
> > mail (bug reports) is still delivered here. So not much is lost.
>
> Indeed. It's mostly record keeping and BTS simplicity that I'm
> concerned about.
Hmm, maybe lintian should warn for wrong QA maint
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:09:10PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG écrivait:
> > However, many packages have debian-qa@lists.debian.org, and a few have
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] was the right address some months ago ... the
> mail (bug r
Le Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:09:10PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG écrivait:
> However, many packages have debian-qa@lists.debian.org, and a few have
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was the right address some months ago ... the
mail (bug reports) is still delivered here. So not much is lost.
>
Thirty-five of the QA-maintained packages have incorrect maintainer
addresses.
The correct address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, many packages have debian-qa@lists.debian.org, and a few have
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is suboptimal, because (among other things) it makes it harder to
get a list of a
7 matches
Mail list logo
