Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-25 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 07:48:20PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> Andreas Barth wrote: >> > Furthermore, even if it is removed, non-US is >> > not processed at the moment, so it wouldn't change anything. >> >> Unfortunately non-US really does need to start being processed

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-25 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 07:48:20PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > Furthermore, even if it is removed, non-US is > > not processed at the moment, so it wouldn't change anything. > > Unfortunately non-US really does need to start being processed. What's so important about

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Andreas Barth wrote: > Furthermore, even if it is removed, non-US is > not processed at the moment, so it wouldn't change anything. Unfortunately non-US really does need to start being processed. Is there anyone capable of doing that who isn't completely swamped? -- There are none so blind as t

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-23 12:56]: > Well, really problematic is IMHO that gutenbrowser is actually not > part of main. Sorry that I can't tell you why at the moment, because > access to merkel is currently restricted. http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt [Date: Mon, 12

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Andreas Barth
* Emanuele Rocca ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040423 12:25]: > * On 23-04-04 - 08:35, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > is there any reason that gutenbrowser is in non-US? > > If not I'd file a bug report to move it to main. > The reason was unzip, which gutenbrowser depends on. > http://bug

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-23 12:16]: > Why is it still in non-US? Because it has not been removed yet. 214930: Please remove gutenbook from main & non-US and gutenbrowser from non-US -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Emanuele Rocca
* On 23-04-04 - 08:35, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is there any reason that gutenbrowser is in non-US? > If not I'd file a bug report to move it to main. The reason was unzip, which gutenbrowser depends on. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=109400 But now that unz

gutenbrowser in non-US

2004-04-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, is there any reason that gutenbrowser is in non-US? If not I'd file a bug report to move it to main. Kind regards Andreas.