Re: gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-28 Thread Raphael Geissert
Mark Brown wrote: > Look, I'm not saying that there's no problem with the upload here. What > I'm saying is that an e-mail such as that which was sent originally sent > tended rather to the hostile and appears to have unrealistic expectation > as to the sort of work that a maintainer is going to d

Re: gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:10:34PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:29:20AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > *sigh* Lintian just isn't the right tool for this job, the sort of > > random things that lintian identifies just aren't interesting for an > > upload like this. > An

Re: gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-28 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:29:20AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:01:22PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Mark Brown (28/04/2010): > > > I'm orphaning the package. What part of that makes you think I'm > > > going to be interested in fixing random lintian warnings? > > >

Re: gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:01:22PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Mark Brown (28/04/2010): > > I'm orphaning the package. What part of that makes you think I'm > > going to be interested in fixing random lintian warnings? > Random lintian warnings (and errors) like the ones you're generating >

Re: gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-28 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Mark Brown (28/04/2010): > I'm orphaning the package. What part of that makes you think I'm > going to be interested in fixing random lintian warnings? Random lintian warnings (and errors) like the ones you're generating by orphaning the package in an improper manner? If you're not used to that

Re: gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 08:11:06PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > From the changelog: > >* Orphan package. > Right, but orphaned packages are _not_ set to this discussion ML. Thanks for your helpful response! > Even running lintian on the package you uploaded points you to the right > d

Re: gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-27 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi Mark, Archive Administrator wrote: > > Accepted: > gob2_2.0.16-3.debian.tar.gz > to main/g/gob2/gob2_2.0.16-3.debian.tar.gz > gob2_2.0.16-3.dsc > to main/g/gob2/gob2_2.0.16-3.dsc > gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.deb > to main/g/gob2/gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.deb > > > Override entries for your package:

gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-27 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: gob2_2.0.16-3.debian.tar.gz to main/g/gob2/gob2_2.0.16-3.debian.tar.gz gob2_2.0.16-3.dsc to main/g/gob2/gob2_2.0.16-3.dsc gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.deb to main/g/gob2/gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: gob2_2.0.16-3.dsc - source devel gob2_2.0.16-3_amd64.deb -