On 22 May 1998, John Goerzen wrote:
> Scott Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > dpkg --purge --force-remove-essential e2fsprogsg
>
> Well, this could help me, but it doesn't help the average user who is
> simply trying to upgrade :-)
The "average user" isn't going to get into a problem where th
Scott Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> > e2fsprogsg
> > e2fslibsg
> >
> > What is the solution to this???
>
> Either use apt (which knows about this and can handle it :), or use
>
> dpkg --purge --force-remove-essential e2fsprogsg
Well, this c
On Thu, May 21, 1998 at 12:33:43AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Take a look at this, after doing an update and then several [I]nstalls
> in dselect:
>
> dpkg: considering removing e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs ...
> dpkg: yes, will remove e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs.
> dpkg: regarding ...
On 21 May 1998, John Goerzen wrote:
> Take a look at this, after doing an update and then several [I]nstalls
> in dselect:
>
> dpkg: considering removing e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs ...
> dpkg: yes, will remove e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs.
> dpkg: regarding .../base/e2fsprogs_1.10-17.d
Take a look at this, after doing an update and then several [I]nstalls
in dselect:
dpkg: considering removing e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs ...
dpkg: yes, will remove e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs.
dpkg: regarding .../base/e2fsprogs_1.10-17.deb containing e2fsprogs:
e2fsprogsg conflicts wi
5 matches
Mail list logo