Re: doomlegacy

2004-09-05 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 12:19:06PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently > > in violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other >

Re: doomlegacy

2004-09-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > #264816. I think the right thing to do is file a bug against ftp.debian.org.

Re: doomlegacy

2004-09-04 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-09-04 Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently > > in violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other > >

Re: doomlegacy

2004-09-04 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently > in violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other > release-critical problems. It also has a number of deficiencies, > and with better

doomlegacy

2004-09-04 Thread Robert Millan
Hi Gordon, QA people, Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently in violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other release-critical problems. It also has a number of deficiencies, and with better alternatives like prboom I'd suggest removal