Re: developer.php bug number parseable

2003-08-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 11:16:02AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Igor Genibel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030818 10:50]: > > I replace the dash '-' because some people want to have the "nobugs" > > field browsable. I replaced it with two consecutive   because of > > some esthetic rendering ;) I don't wa

Re: developer.php bug number parseable

2003-08-18 Thread Andreas Barth
* Igor Genibel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030818 10:50]: > I replace the dash '-' because some people want to have the "nobugs" > field browsable. I replaced it with two consecutive   because of > some esthetic rendering ;) I don't want to provide an underligned dash. How about: "  ". This would make in

Re: developer.php bug number parseable

2003-08-18 Thread Igor Genibel
* Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-18 10:56:40 +0200]: > Hi > [...] > That would be really great. I could of course use some other tool to do > the parsing but the lynx-thing was really easy. Any suggestions is > appriciated. :) As Martin said, I will use a stylesheet class for "dash l

Re: developer.php bug number parseable

2003-08-18 Thread Igor Genibel
* Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-17 14:10:22 +0200]: > Hi Hi Ola, > During the process of tracking down non active non DD:s I use > the developer.php html files. Something have changed there. > Formerly if there were 0 bugs it was presented as '-' now it is > presented as ' '. It is

developer.php bug number parseable

2003-08-17 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi During the process of tracking down non active non DD:s I use the developer.php html files. Something have changed there. Formerly if there were 0 bugs it was presented as '-' now it is presented as ' '. It is now impossible to (without parsing the html...) tell what is a bug and what is packag