On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:39:58PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 13:20 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > Hi Drew
> >
> > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > > The configuration of ci.debian.org is not consistent. A failing
> > > > test
> > > > of deal.ii is marked
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 13:20 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Drew
>
> > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > The configuration of ci.debian.org is not consistent. A failing
> > > test
> > > of deal.ii is marked on
> > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/deal.ii/testing/amd64/
> > > as tr
Hi Drew
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> The configuration of ci.debian.org is not consistent. A failing test
>> of deal.ii is marked on
>> https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/deal.ii/testing/amd64/
>> as triggered by petsc/3.9.3+dfsg1-2, but the test log shows that in
>> fact libpetsc
Hi,
moving this to debian...@lists.debian.org. debian-qa is of no help here.
Thanks.
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Drew Parsons wrote:
> The configuration of ci.debian.org is not consistent. A failing test
> of deal.ii is marked on
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/deal.ii/testing/amd64/
> as trigge
The configuration of ci.debian.org is not consistent. A failing test
of deal.ii is marked on
https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/deal.ii/testing/amd64/
as triggered by petsc/3.9.3+dfsg1-2, but the test log shows that in
fact libpetsc-real3.8-dev is used for the test
(i.e. petsc/3.8.4+dfsg1-2+b2).
5 matches
Mail list logo