On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 02:54:26PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Do you intend to incorporate the changes I made in my NMU or should I just
> > > forget about them?
> >
> > I incorporated many of th
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 02:54:26PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ah, I was confusing the install announcements with the upload
announcements. I found it.
> > Do you intend to incorporate the changes I made in my NMU
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 03:52:30PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > You might check debian-devel-changes for uploads from me too :-)
>
> No upload announcement for base-files was made from you. If there was I
> didn't receive it; perhaps you could se
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 03:52:30PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 02:52:46PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > It is ok to NMU a package because of having an important bug, but please
> > > follow the guidelines in developer
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I currently see a base-files 2.1.12 in Incoming/REJECT, but no reason
> file, why this upload failed ...
I first uploaded it to erlangen, but then I realized the changelog was
wrong (it said "updated /etc/inputrc" instead of "updated /etc/profile")
so
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 03:02:25PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I currently see a base-files 2.1.12 in Incoming/REJECT, but no reason
> file, why this upload failed ...
>
> Santiago, do you make a new upload, or would it be possible that
> Brandon makes a 2.1.12.0 upload?
It doesn't matter; dep
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Santiago Vila writes:
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > Matthias, you might want to re-upload bash and libreadlineg2 with either
> a
> > > Depends: base-files (>> 2.1.11)
> > > or a
> > > Conflicts: base-files (<= 2.1.11
Santiago Vila writes:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > Matthias, you might want to re-upload bash and libreadlineg2 with either a
> > Depends: base-files (>> 2.1.11)
> > or a
> > Conflicts: base-files (<= 2.1.11)
> >
> > They currently depend on base-files (>= 2.1.12),
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Matthias, you might want to re-upload bash and libreadlineg2 with either a
> Depends: base-files (>> 2.1.11)
> or a
> Conflicts: base-files (<= 2.1.11)
>
> They currently depend on base-files (>= 2.1.12), which doesn't exist yet.
It does now, so I d
Matthias, you might want to re-upload bash and libreadlineg2 with either a
Depends: base-files (>> 2.1.11)
or a
Conflicts: base-files (<= 2.1.11)
They currently depend on base-files (>= 2.1.12), which doesn't exist yet.
2.1.11.1 below fixes the replaces problem.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
10 matches
Mail list logo
