As always many developers tell that watch file need to be maintained in an
external system.
Actually Dehs is based on watch file founded in official debian packages and
on the automatically generated watch file (for packages that doesn't have
one).
All this data are in a postgres db on alioth and s
On 11103 March 1977, David Moreno Garza wrote:
>> Could we do any action for let maintainers to adopt this watch file?
> I'd suggest bug filling and NMUing if necessary. I volunteer for helping
> on it.
A watchfile is IMO no reason to do any NMU. Its, at best, a wishlist severity
bug.
--
bye J
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 02:57 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I am afraid I disagree: a watch file inside a package cannot be updated
> without updating the package. That means watch files in packages in a
> stable Debian release are not going to get updated, they are there just
> to confuse people wi
On 8/6/07, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am afraid I disagree: a watch file inside a package cannot be updated
> without updating the package. That means watch files in packages in a
> stable Debian release are not going to get updated, they are there just
> to confuse people with
On su, 2007-08-05 at 18:34 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> You mean, we shouldn't use watch files within packages? That's
> possible,
> of course, but it's the maintainers' job to inform QA or any other group
> of monkeys where future release should be fetched. The static package of
> course wil
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> Could we do any action for let maintainers to adopt this watch file?
I'd suggest bug filling and NMUing if necessary. I volunteer for helping
on it.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
Respeto a Nicaragua y a la
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 20:32 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Could we, perhaps, instead do some action to have the watch files
> maintained somewhere centrally, instead of embedding information that
> will get outdated in packages?
>
> debian/copyright tells us where the code for the package was ret
On su, 2007-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> Could we do any action for let maintainers to adopt this watch file?
Could we, perhaps, instead do some action to have the watch files
maintained somewhere centrally, instead of embedding information that
will get outdated in packages?
debian/
Hi,
here[1] there are 890 (see the last column in the table) automatically
generated and uscan checked watch file for packages that don't have
included one.
Naturally it needs a manual check before insert this watch file in
packages.
Could we do any action for let maintainers to adopt this watch fi
9 matches
Mail list logo
