tags 362162 moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 05:40:17PM +0100, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> # Please remove tidev-modules
> reassign 362162 ftp.debian.org
> retitle 362162 RM: tidev-modules -- RoQA, now part of linux-2.6
> [...]
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Nat
# Remove sctplib
reassign 340938 ftp.debian.org
retitle 340938 RM: sctplib -- RoQA; SCTP implementation inside the kernel
# Remove socketapi
reassign 340939 ftp.debian.org
retitle 340939 RM: socketapi -- RoQA; SCTP implementation inside the kernel
thanks
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007, Moritz Muehlenhoff
# Please remove tidev-modules
reassign 362162 ftp.debian.org
retitle 362162 RM: tidev-modules -- RoQA, now part of linux-2.6
# Please remove qla2x00
reassign 366743 ftp.debian.org
retitle 366743 RM: qla2x00 -- RoQA, now part of linux-2.6
thanks
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> N
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> tidev-modules: 43 (9 votes)
This is now part of the linux-2.6 package.
> In "non-free":
> qla2x00: 11 (4 votes)
> -- this should be expected to have low popcon counts.
>But if nobody cares enough to fix the bugs (I don't),
>removal should be requested: it is non-
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> sctplib: 8 (1 vote)
> socketapi: 5
This can probably be removed; there's now an SCTP implementation inside
the kernel and the version above might very well be outdated wrt to
the current standard. (it's from September 2005)
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Revisiting http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/09/msg00013.html .
Some have been ITAed or adopted and are removed from the list. :-)
Others have been removed from Debian or removal requests filed (some by me)
and are likewise removed from the list. :-)
It looks like we could use a Korean-spe
Revisiting http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/09/msg00013.html .
Some have been ITAed or adopted and are removed from the list. :-)
Others have been removed from Debian or removal requests filed (some by me)
and are likewise removed from the list. :-)
It looks like we could use a Korean-spe
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> manpages-fi: 14
>> manpages-ko: 16
>
> Dropping these is really not an option; Debian is committed to
> internationalization.
Well, I guess core manpages don't change that much, so even if they're
very obsolete, they are probably still useful. And they're less ea
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> malaga: 16 (5 votes)
Please note from #369161 that there is someone who might be willing to
maintain malaga if asked, under sponsorship.
> manpages-fi: 14
> manpages-ko: 16
Dropping these is really not an option; Debian is committed to
internationa
This is an update on http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/08/msg00115.html.
Some have been ITAed or adopted and are removed from the list. :-)
Others have been removed from Debian or removal requests filed (some by me)
and are likewise removed from the list. :-)
eco5000: 10
hanterm-xf: 17 (5
Update on http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/06/msg00043.html.
Some have been ITAed or adopted and are removed from the list. :-)
Others have been removed from Debian or removal requests filed and are likewise
removed
from the list. :-)
eco5000: 10
elisp-manual-ja: 16
emacs-lisp-intro-ja:
11 matches
Mail list logo
