On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:30:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> It's fixed in UDD now. I'm not sure if
> https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch uses UDD though, but it's fixed as
> well:
> https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=onioncircuits
>
> So either it is using UDD behind the scenes, or some
On 20/05/16 at 14:43 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
>
> > I was wondering what version of scan is used for
> > https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?
>
> The version from jessie-backports.
>
> > However, this seems to result in an error in the a
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> I was wondering what version of scan is used for
> https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?
The version from jessie-backports.
> However, this seems to result in an error in the automatic runs, see
> https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg
Hi,
I was wondering what version of scan is used for
https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?
For a package (onioncircuits) whose upstream project does not provide tarballs
but only a git repo, I have added a “mode=git” version 4 watchfile to help me
find out when new upstream versions are tagged.
4 matches
Mail list logo