Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:17:47 +0200
with message-id <20190821151747.GA1452@nicolasthinkpad>
and subject line should have been closed one year ago
has caused the Debian Bug report #898554,
regarding fakeupstream.cgi: please stop redirecting Adacore website
to be marked as done.
> > The redirector for AdaCore packages is hard to maintain
> > (their website uses various indirections and hashes, the format changes
> > many times a year)
> > for a very small benefit (they release exactly once a year).
> > Please consider the attached patch and remove the related stanza.
>
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> The redirector for AdaCore packages is hard to maintain
> (their website uses various indirections and hashes, the format changes many
> times a year)
> for a very small benefit (they release exactly once a year).
> Please consider the
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hello.
The redirector for AdaCore packages is hard to maintain
(their website uses various indirections and hashes, the format changes many
times a year)
for a very small benefit (they release exactly once a year).
Please consider the attached
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Hello,
Starting a build with 0 node should stop the builds.
Instead, I get:
[00:01] Starting 868 tasks on 0 nodes (3 slots per node) ...
[00:02] *** total: 868 OK: 0 (0%) To retry: 0 (0%) Failed: 0 (0%)
Etc
Thanks,
Sylvestre
-- System Information
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:02:20PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Justin
>
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> [...]
> | 1. Assert that every .orig.tar.gz which does not extract to
> | foo_ver.orig/ is identical to the one provided by upstream.
> [...]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Justin
Justin Pryzby wrote:
[...]
| 1. Assert that every .orig.tar.gz which does not extract to
| foo_ver.orig/ is identical to the one provided by upstream.
[...]
| 1 is a safety measure. It prevents people from using a nonoriginal
| .orig, fo
Hmm. I quite like the dehs idea. Possibly there are no well-defined
goals so far, but this is an area Debian as a whole could improve in.
Here are some thoughts.
1. Assert that every .orig.tar.gz which does not extract to
foo_ver.orig/ is identical to the one provided by upstream.
2. Keep
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 06:44:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:32:30AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not a debian developer, so i could not post on dda mailing list. I
> > > had o
Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Thiemo Seufer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Do *not* file 6229 bugs about the same subject. Never.
> >
> > Why not? As wishlist bugs with patch this seems sensible to me.
>
> I assume that you will hand-check the patches in those 6229 bug
> reports that the watch files
Re: Thiemo Seufer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Do *not* file 6229 bugs about the same subject. Never.
>
> Why not? As wishlist bugs with patch this seems sensible to me.
I assume that you will hand-check the patches in those 6229 bug
reports that the watch files actually do the right thing before y
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
[snip]
> > > I had try to randomly submit wishlist bugs for 6 packages to bts with
> > > the tag "patch" pointing to the dehs site or attaching the watch file to
> > > the bug.
> > > Almost all of this bug was closed and the watch file was check (in some
> > > cases fix
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> [Why to cc on policy? Cut]
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:32:30AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
>
> > >If people don't care as much about this as you think they should,
> > >perhaps it would be a good idea to try explaining why they *sh
[Why to cc on policy? Cut]
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:32:30AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> >If people don't care as much about this as you think they should,
> >perhaps it would be a good idea to try explaining why they *should*
> >care, instead of just lamenting their lack of a telepathic
> >under
our intentions?
> This is not true.
You are entitled to believe that the idea is not good. In that case,
I wish you the best of luck.
> I'm not a debian developer, so i could not post on dda mailing list.
How does not being a DD stop you from giving explanations elsewhere?
Your posting
>The community might start considering it less useless if an
>explanation of what it is supposed to be good for was actually
>available. In particular, why should a maintainer care about watch
>files if he uses something else than uscan to keep track of upstream
>happenings?
>From time to time, th
Scripsit Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There is no reason to put more work and effort on a community tool that
> community itself consider useless.
The community might start considering it less useless if an
explanation of what it is supposed to be good for was actually
available. In particula
After another gruelling discussion on #debian-devel about the useless of
dehs and the lack of watch file (75,60% of non native debian packages
doesn't had one), I think that dehs is start to begin only my own
personal toys, so i'm thinking to stop it and to leave alioth resources
Cable TV Subscribers
Get Our Cable TV Filter and Stop-Paying For Your Pay-Per-View, Mature Channels,
Movie Channels, Sporting Events...
Find Out More - http://www.XhenTronic.net?refid=1001858361131
Don't worry, it's perfectly-legal.
Check out our legal pa
Package: libc6.1-dev
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-23
Severity: wishlist
Please could you remove "libc6-dev" from the Provides line in the libc6.1-dev
package?
The Debian package-set should be aware that libc-dev is not libc6-dev and
stop depending on libc6-dev unconditionaly.
id 19eUzd-96-T9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:21:57 +0200
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:21:56 +0200
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stop packaging of s10sh -- for Canon PowerShot digital cameras?
Message-ID: <[E
Jul 2003 08:53:53 -0700
To: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stop packaging of xemacs-packages -- Debian packaging of XEmacs
packages?
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 08:53:53 -07
Hi Matthew!
You wrote:
> Please please stop sending these semi-automated emails to debian-qa
> bug reports! My mailbox is groaning under the load of the BTS barfing
> on your emails.
I'm sorry for that; those mails weren't intended to go to the mailing
list at all, but I scre
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Please please stop sending these semi-automated emails to debian-qa
> bug reports! My mailbox is groaning under the load of the BTS barfing
> on your emails.
As if this was intentional...
Peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .'
Hi,
Please please stop sending these semi-automated emails to debian-qa
bug reports! My mailbox is groaning under the load of the BTS barfing
on your emails.
Matthew
--
Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire
http://www.pick.ucam.org
)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 1999 01:21:33 -
Received: from alphenglor by rhme114 with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
id 11umqK-0005hc-00; Sun, 05 Dec 1999 20:21:32 -0500
From: Rob Mahurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ssh2: fails to configure -- does not stop d
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 1999 05:42:16 -
Received: (qmail 26668 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 1999 05:42:15 -
Date: 29 Nov 1999 05:42:15 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: browser-history: please stop usin
(HELO kitenet.net)
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 1999 05:44:31 -
Received: (qmail 26912 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 1999 05:44:31 -
Date: 29 Nov 1999 05:44:31 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mcvert: pleas
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 05:44:31AM -, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: mcvert
>
> dh_du does nothing, and has been depreacted for years, and I want to get it
> removed from debhelper before potato is released. mcvert is one of the
> very few packages that still uses it. Please simply delete the c
Package: mcvert
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
dh_du does nothing, and has been depreacted for years, and I want to get it
removed from debhelper before potato is released. mcvert is one of the
very few packages that still uses it. Please simply delete the call from
debian/rules.
-- System Info
30 matches
Mail list logo
