Re: State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable

2005-11-16 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Replacement (2.6 Kernel) in the works, should be removed once 2.6 is > stable enough: > >Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > kernel-image-2.4.27-m68kBuild-Depends: gcc-2.95 > kernel-patch-2.

Re: State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable

2005-11-15 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Malloc debugging, #285685 suggests it is broken for > 300 days now, > either update or remove: > >Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ccmallocBuild-Depends: g++-2.95 [alpha arm i386 m68k > mips mipsel p

Re: State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable

2005-11-15 Thread Ben Pfaff
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unacknowledged NMU for > one year, either update or remove: > >Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > gccchecker Build-Depends: gcc-2.95 I recently filed a request to have this package removed. It is not maintained upstream and valgrind is a be

State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable

2005-11-15 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Hello All, while preparing an upload of gcc-2.95 which fixes its worst problems I wondered how many users of it are actually left. 9 packages in unstable still declare a build dependency on gcc-2.95 or g++-2.95, this makes it IMHO a plausible release goal to get rid of 2.95 maintenance for etch.