Re: Bug#158332: Small update on dhcp-dns

2005-08-15 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 158332 RM: dhcp-dns -- RoQA; dead upstream, superseded by dhcp3-server reassign 158332 ftp.debian.org thanks On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 02:17:11PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > Matej Vela schrieb: > > [dhcp-dns] > > >>I don't think it's worth the effort to save that package, as it

Re: Bug#158332: Small update on dhcp-dns

2005-08-15 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Matej Vela schrieb: [dhcp-dns] >>I don't think it's worth the effort to save that package, as it needs to >>be rewritten in large parts. > Since no one stepped up, I guess we can remove it from unstable too? Yes, its functionality is now provided by the DHCP servers directly, so there is n

Re: Bug#158332: Small update on dhcp-dns

2005-08-14 Thread Matej Vela
Hi, On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:27:37PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > >>If not, I think we should remove dhcp-dns--it's been orphaned for more than > >>3 years, upstream abandoned it, and the equivalent functionality is provided > >>by dhcp3-server. > > > Simon, please reply and act immediately if

Re: Bug#158332: Small update on dhcp-dns

2005-04-30 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, >>If not, I think we should remove dhcp-dns--it's been orphaned for more than >>3 years, upstream abandoned it, and the equivalent functionality is provided >>by dhcp3-server. > Simon, please reply and act immediately if you want to save this package > for sarge. I don't think it's worth the

Re: Small update on dhcp-dns

2005-04-30 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 12:39:42PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:32:43AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > What is the status? The above message is nearly two years old :) > > Jeroen, did you get any reply? No > If not, I think we should remove dhcp-dns--it's been

Re: Small update on dhcp-dns

2005-04-30 Thread Matej Vela
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:32:43AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 05:09:43PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote: > > Good news, everyone! > > > > Upstream seems to have disappeared, amd the current package is > > sufficiently broken. I'm going to give the entire thing a full