Re: Remove pgeasy from testing

2004-02-25 Thread Andreas Barth
* Martin Pitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040225 11:10]: > So I would vote for removing it from testing, but to keep it in > unstable for a while. > > What do you think? What shall I do in this case? Bug Report against > ftp.d.o or qa.d.o? Normally: Speak with the release-team on [EMAIL PROTECTED] In t

Re: Remove pgeasy from testing

2004-02-25 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:56:43AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > What do you think? What shall I do in this case? Bug Report against > ftp.d.o or qa.d.o? For removals from testing only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the way to go, AFAIK. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djp

Remove pgeasy from testing

2004-02-25 Thread Martin Pitt
be appropriate in this case to remove pgeasy from testing? This should not be a problem: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache rdepends libpgeasy libpgeasy Reverse Depends: libpgeasy-dev It seems that pgeasy is not very widely used anyway... I don't really care abou