reassign 279824 ftp.debian.org
retitle 279824 RM: perlftlib -- RoQA; buggy, orphaned
thanks
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 08:22:50PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:28:33PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > perlftlib can be removed, I've sp
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:28:33PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > perlftlib can be removed, I've sponsored the last package build-depending
> > on it recently and it's coupled to freetype 1, which won't be included
> > in Lenny.
>
> defoma still recommends it. Has
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:28:33PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> perlftlib can be removed, I've sponsored the last package build-depending
> on it recently and it's coupled to freetype 1, which won't be included
> in Lenny.
defoma still recommends it. Has someone verified that this can be
dro
perlftlib can be removed, I've sponsored the last package build-depending
on it recently and it's coupled to freetype 1, which won't be included
in Lenny.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/16/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a gtk+1.2 application that has seen no upstream activity since 2004;
it has 22 active users according to popcon, and there doesn't appear to be
anything I would describe as a gtk+2.0 alarm clock in the archive, but it's
one of only tw
Hi,
On Sun Jul 15, 2007 at 15:33:27 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Should sanduhr be removed from unstable?
seconded, even so it has 175 users according popcon.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Hi folks,
The sanduhr package has been orphaned for over a year; in the orphaning
upload, the maintainer, who is also upstream, commented that he has no time
for working on the package or the upstream software.
This is a gtk+1.2 application that has seen no upstream activity since 2004;
it has 22
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> i am not sure if i overlooked your answer to my last mail. Is there anything
> we
> can help on #232810? As we are going to freeze realy soon now (looks like both
> ends of the toolchain are fixed by now), i fear that openmosix will be
> dropped
Hello,
I've been researching RC bugs for my NM T&S part and came across the
python-pcgi package (bug #225539). After downloading the latest upstream
version of this package I found out that:
1. Upstream has a new author and he changed the program name to python-pcgi2
to avoid a name clash with an
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > question about a removal from testing:
> > >
> > > openmosix
> > >
> > > It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer.
> >
> > Actually, I was working on that al
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > question about a removal from testing:
> >
> > openmosix
> >
> > It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer.
>
> Actually, I was working on that already (well, that issue was fixed, I
> was t
* Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-18 11:55]:
[libflux0]
> QA : it seems that the maintainer is MIA. Maybe we should orphaned
> this package.
He said this package can be removed from unstable. I'll do so later.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-18 11:55]:
> QA : it seems that the maintainer is MIA. Maybe we should orphaned
> this package.
I've contacted him, thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I suggest that we remove libflux0 from testing.
No maintainer upload since 2001, RC bug related to old libtool,
and it seems that a new software is available on fluxlib.org.
This software seems deprecated.
QA : it seems that the maintainer is MIA. Maybe we should orphaned this
package.
Ch
14 matches
Mail list logo
