Darren O. Benham writes:
> >Is it normal that the files are sitting here since a couple of days
> >and I did not get warned by dinstall ?
>
> I'm pretty sure dinstall (I don't know if Debian has any supporting scripts
> that would warn) proper only works on *.changes files..
Probably it coul
In linux.debian.qa, you wrote:
>> Package: console-tools (main)
>> Maintainer: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 49158 console-tools; error while upgrading
>
>Can someone take a look at this issue and provide a fix for it?
>
>> Package: kbd (main)
>> Maintainer: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 09:41:46PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Strange, I didn't notice this effect here. I will try to reproduce it,
> but I'm not sure if I will be able to do so.
>
> > be opened by pressing Alt-n or by opening a new URL with the middle
> > mouse button. Then I close unneede
On 99-12-02 Yann Dirson wrote:
> > Package: console-tools (main)
> > Maintainer: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 49158 console-tools; error while upgrading
> Can someone take a look at this issue and provide a fix for it?
> > Package: kbd (main)
> > Maintainer: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> Package: console-tools (main)
> Maintainer: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 49158 console-tools; error while upgrading
Can someone take a look at this issue and provide a fix for it?
> Package: kbd (main)
> Maintainer: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 50431 kbd: Bug in /sbin/kbdconfig?
Christian Kurz schrieb am Mittwoch, den 01. Dezember 1999:
> > My experience is, that the libc6 versions of netscape 4.61 and 4.7
> > are not really stable with libc 6.1. To be precise, both programs
> > often (not always) die, when you enter a wrong password or when
> > you close a netscape windo
On 99-11-30 Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> Christian Kurz schrieb am Dienstag, den 30. November 1999:
What does this mean? ;)
> > Does netscape really needs libc5?
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldd /opt/netscape/netscape
> [...]
> > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40151000)
> > This Version oft Netsc
[I'm replying to all because i don't really know what i should do...]
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 07:09:16AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 99-12-01 Fabrice Gautier wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 07:51:00PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > > > Package: gnomba (main)
> > > > > > Maintainer:
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Package: tkseti (contrib)
> > Maintainer: Gopal Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [REMOVE] This package can be removed if it is not fixed.
> > 48676 app hangs and brings down or logs out xdm when destroyed
>
> And also here w
On 99-12-01 Fabrice Gautier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 07:51:00PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > > Package: gnomba (main)
> > > > > Maintainer: Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > 50399 XFree eat all the memory when i launch gnomba
> > > >
> > > > Needs to be examined to see
Please remove optimizer as requested in my bug report a while back.
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Adam Heath writes:
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Christian Kurz wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Package: libg++272 (main)
> > > > > > Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Christian Kurz schrieb am Dienstag, den 30. November 1999:
> Does netscape really needs libc5?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldd /opt/netscape/netscape
[...]
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40151000)
> This Version oft Netscape doesn't need a libc5 and is running very
> well here. So why do we ne
Adam Heath writes:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> > > > > Package: libg++272 (main)
> > > > > Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > 47212 [m68k] libg++272_2.7.2.8-1 build failure
> > > >
> > > > Here we need the help from the M68K-Team t
On 99-11-30 Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > > Package: libg++272 (main)
> > > > > Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > 47212 [m68k] libg++272_2.7.2.8-1 build failure
> > > >
> > > > Here we need the help from the M68K-Team
On 99-11-29 Marcelo Magallon wrote:
> [ trimmed "To:" a little. Please CC me, I'm not on -devel nor -qa ]
And trimmed it again a bit.
> Ok. Got a box of my own. Installed Debian on it. No network access
> yet. Working on that. BTW, I haven't checked this, but there seems
Okay, this is no p
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > Package: libg++272 (main)
> > > > Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > 47212 [m68k] libg++272_2.7.2.8-1 build failure
> > >
> > > Here we need the help from the M68K-Team to find the bug and a solution
> > > for
On 99-11-30 Matthias Klose wrote:
> Christian Kurz writes:
> > > Package: libg++2.8.2-dev (main)
> > > Maintainer: Debian EGCS maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 50048 libg++2.8.2-dev: empty package on sparc
> >
> > When will the package become removed as stated in the BTS?
> There exi
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 10:45:34PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > bash will be ready when we release I am sure. He did another set of
> > packages and I will test them as soon as possible.
>
> Can any of us others test it, too? You know, you're not the only one
> with a machine which may be trash
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 12:46:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Package: libg++272 (main)
> > > Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 47212 [m68k] libg++272_2.7.2.8-1 build failure
> >
> > Here we need the help from the M68K-Team to find the bug and a solution
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 10:00:47AM +0100, Marcelo Magallon wrote:
> > > Package: gltt2 (main)
> > > Maintainer: Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 50596 gltt2: current version needs recompile.
> >
> > Can someone please recompile the package with the new libc?
>
> Please NMU,
Christian Kurz writes:
> > Package: libg++2.8.2-dev (main)
> > Maintainer: Debian EGCS maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 50048 libg++2.8.2-dev: empty package on sparc
>
> When will the package become removed as stated in the BTS?
There exists a bug filed against ftp.debian.org.
> > Pa
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 09:38:08PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > Matthias, when will you NMU bash 2.03 and close some of those bug
> > reports?
>
> bash will be ready when we release I am sure. He did another set of
> packages and I will test them as soon as possible.
Can any of us others
On 99-11-27 Milan Zamazal wrote:
> > "CK" == Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Package: sabre (main)
> >> Maintainer: Milan Zamazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> [REMOVE] This package can be removed if it is not fixed.
> >> 49656 sabre_0.2.4-4(unstable): cflags script
> > Package: nfs-common (main)
> > Maintainer: Anders Hammarquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 50872 nfs-common: NFS file locking broken with LinUX 2.2.x
>
> Needs some examination, by someone with familar with NFS.
Most likely the reporters setup is broken. I've not had a response on my
request fo
[ trimmed "To:" a little. Please CC me, I'm not on -devel nor -qa ]
Ok. Got a box of my own. Installed Debian on it. No network access
yet. Working on that. BTW, I haven't checked this, but there seems
to be some issue with Athlons: slink disc #2 boots ok, #1 doesn't
(CD's from Linux Central
> "CK" == Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Package: sabre (main)
>> Maintainer: Milan Zamazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> [REMOVE] This package can be removed if it is not fixed.
>> 49656 sabre_0.2.4-4(unstable): cflags script buggy
CK> Milan, have you uploaded a
Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I sent this email to debian-devel, bugscan, debian-qa, debian-qa-private
> and debian-private to reach as many maintainers as possible.
Hrm. I'm not sure how I feel about that.
> > Package: tkstep4.2 (main)
> > Maintainer: Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAI
On 99-11-28 Rob Browning wrote:
> Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Package: emacs20 (main)
> > > Maintainer: Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 33237 /etc/alternatives/emacs not managed properly - /usr/bin/emacs
> > > doesn't run emacs20
> > > [STRATEGY] Maintainer promised
Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Package: emacs20 (main)
> > Maintainer: Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 33237 /etc/alternatives/emacs not managed properly - /usr/bin/emacs
> > doesn't run emacs20
> > [STRATEGY] Maintainer promised to fix this.
>
> When will this one become
On 99-11-28 Francesco Tapparo wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > Package: scwm (main)
> > > Maintainer: Francesco Tapparo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 50395 scwm: recompile for libguile6
> >
> > Francesco, when will you recompile it or can we NMU it?
>
Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > Package: ispell (main)
> > Maintainer: David L. Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 49487 ispell: can't build from source
>
> Is this bug fixed by now?
Yes; was fixed in 3.1.20-3 and uploaded in 3.1.20-4, so was not
automatically closed -- I manua
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Package: scwm (main)
> > Maintainer: Francesco Tapparo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 50395 scwm: recompile for libguile6
>
> Francesco, when will you recompile it or can we NMU it?
The reason of the delay is not the recompile (this
>> Package: erlang (main) Maintainer: Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 49377 erlang: can't build from source
Christian> How can this be fixed?
Has been fixed for 2 days, will close the bug
On 99-11-27 Branden Robinson wrote:
> Sorry for the spam; someone please direct me to the correct forum. Is it
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
[Cut the Cc-list down, as I forgot to set a Mail-Followup-To-Header]
> On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > Package: xbase-clients
On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 11:22:25AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> This would be a possible solution, but is a good solution? I just looked
> through the emails in the BTS about this issue and think that Joey
> (M.Schulze) made a good suggestion how rexec should behave. What about
> this suggesti
On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 11:03:16AM +1100, Tyson Dowd wrote:
> It's kind of difficult to test them because I don't have root access to an
> alpha machine, and gnucash has about a billion dependencies which I need
> to get installed.
There is an easier way. You locate the list of your package's sour
On 99-11-28 Herbert Xu wrote:
> Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Package: kernel-image-2.2.13 (main)
> >> Maintainer: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> 49723 kernel: devpts module not installed by default
> >> [FIXED] Fixed package kernel-image-2.2.13-i386 is in Incoming
> >
Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Package: kernel-image-2.2.13 (main)
>> Maintainer: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 49723 kernel: devpts module not installed by default
>> [FIXED] Fixed package kernel-image-2.2.13-i386 is in Incoming
> Herbert, has the new bug-fixing upload yet
> > Package: gnucash (main)
> > Maintainer: Tyson Dowd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [REMOVE] This package can be removed if it is not fixed.
> > 49485 gnucash: can't build from source
>
> Could be easy to fix.
I've fixed this particular problem. It is the latest in a long line
of alpha build prob
Sorry for the spam; someone please direct me to the correct forum. Is it
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Package: xbase-clients (main)
> > Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 48199 xauth can't handle IP changes
>
> Brand
On 99-11-27 Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Christian Kurz wrote:
> >
> >I sent this email to debian-devel, bugscan, debian-qa, debian-qa-private
> >and debian-private to reach as many maintainers as possible.
>
> A bit over the top! I have trimmed the reply list.
Thanks, I forgot to add a Mail-F
> "Erik" == Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Erik> I have fixes for both of these (proper fixes, not silly
Erik> kludges) in CVS now, and am doing some final testing before
Erik> uploading a new version this weekend. This also fixes the
Erik> nethack Y2K bugs, and I'l
Christian Kurz wrote:
>
>I sent this email to debian-devel, bugscan, debian-qa, debian-qa-private
>and debian-private to reach as many maintainers as possible.
A bit over the top! I have trimmed the reply list.
...
>> Package: libpgsql2 (main)
>> Maintainer: Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROT
On Sat Nov 27, 1999 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> > Package: gnomehack (main)
> > Maintainer: Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [REMOVE] This package can be removed if it is not fixed.
> > 49269 gnomehack: segmentation fault
>
> A possible solution is in the BTS.
>
> >
I posted a note to the BTS that this is maybe not a bug. In the source
code, it's documented as being a deliberate decision of the designer.
My apologies if this reply goes to too many lists and people.
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999 17:21:45 +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
>> Package: fetchmail (main)
>> M
>> > 49887 apache: typo in config prevents startup
>> This is an very easy to fix bug, but there hasn't been any reaction from
>> the maintainer since 14 days. Johnie, do you fix this within three days
>> or can we make a NMU?
If this is so easy to fix NMU it immediately; consensus on IRC is t
[I'm sure this shouldn't really go to all those lists, but that's what the
Mail-Followup-To: header said, so that's what I'm doing]
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Package: chimera2 (main)
> > Maintainer: Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [REMOVE] This package
According to Christian Kurz:
> > Package: deliver (main)
> > Maintainer: Scott K. Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 49200 deliver: cannot log error messages
>
> Scott, have you examined this bug or do you need some help?
This is an easy bug to fix -- Deliver is supposed to be installed
setuid-roo
I took over fdutils and the bug is closed as of now.
Regards,
Vaidhy
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> > Package: fdutils (main)
> > Maintainer: Anthony Fok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 51040 MAKEFLOPPIES, run from postinst, is too fragile...
>
> Can someone plea
I sent this email to debian-devel, bugscan, debian-qa, debian-qa-private
and debian-private to reach as many maintainers as possible.
I hope that some of those bugs get fixed by now or I will surely do some
a NMUs if the maintainer is happy about it or not. I won't accept that
bugs like #45428 st
50 matches
Mail list logo
