Re: svn false positives (was ... (mass) svn-to-git migration)

2023-02-06 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Monday, 6 February 2023 11:41:15 CET Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > I searched that list and checked a few of them ... and they all seem to be > > on salsa already. What's the best way to deal with those? > > Since the authoritative data is what's in the Sources file, I'd say > please upload the pac

Re: svn false positives (was ... (mass) svn-to-git migration)

2023-02-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > I searched that list and checked a few of them ... and they all seem to be on > salsa already. What's the best way to deal with those? Since the authoritative data is what's in the Sources file, I'd say please upload the packages

Re: svn false positives (was ... (mass) svn-to-git migration)

2023-02-03 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Friday, 27 January 2023 20:14:43 CET Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > I've been looking at how to do a mass conversion. There's about 375 packages > still listed as being on alioth (~100 in SVN, ~267 in Git, the rest in > something else). > https://janitor.debian.net/cupboard/result-codes/hosted-on-aliot