Re: sf.php source

2005-12-17 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:52:09 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > That's what I can think of, but this has never been discussed before to > the best of my knowledge, so the real original answer is most likely > just "Because the author choose php". please add also "the author doesn't like php b

Re: sf.php source

2005-12-09 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 05:26:54PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Fair enough. But I just noticed > >RewriteRule ^/watch/sf.php/(.*) /watch/sf.php?project=$1 Huh, curious... indeed. Weird, as it isn't needed at all, PHP has the possibility to look at the part after the file just as easily.

Re: sf.php source

2005-12-09 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:03:44PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:00:30PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 19:52 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:44:05PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > So, I figured ou

Re: sf.php source

2005-12-08 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:00:30PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 19:52 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:44:05PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > So, I figured out how to use CVS again, and looked at the source for > > >

Re: sf.php source

2005-12-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 19:52 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:44:05PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > So, I figured out how to use CVS again, and looked at the source for > > . Is there any reason for > > implementation in PHP rathe

Re: sf.php source

2005-12-08 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:44:05PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > So, I figured out how to use CVS again, and looked at the source for > . Is there any reason for > implementation in PHP rather than with an apache redirect? php code changes take effect immediatel