Hi Martin!
You wrote:
> * James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-08 03:13]:
> > So would (1) be okay with you? Or do you have any better ideas?
>
> I think it's the best option. Also, I'm willing to spend some time
> evaluating such reassigned bugs.
me too
--
Kind regards,
+--
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:13:11AM +, James Troup wrote:
> (1) reassign the bug to qa.debian.org
> (2) reassign the bug to the package
> (3) close it
>
> So would (1) be okay with you? Or do you have any better ideas?
I think it's effective. If it becomes burdensome, the issue can be
revi
* James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-08 03:13]:
> So would (1) be okay with you? Or do you have any better ideas?
I think it's the best option. Also, I'm willing to spend some time
evaluating such reassigned bugs.
> [1] e.g. #175757
I have seen this bug and wanted to comment on it. We h
3 matches
Mail list logo