Re: pilot-qof & dpkg-cross reports in PTS

2010-05-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 16 May 2010 13:59:52 +0200 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On sneon 15 Maaie 2010, Neil Williams wrote: > > I find it confusing that either CVE is still listed in the security > > tracker at all. > > > > When a CVE bug is closed as invalid or illogical, why isn't the CVE > > also deleted or rem

Re: pilot-qof & dpkg-cross reports in PTS

2010-05-16 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Neil, On sneon 15 Maaie 2010, Neil Williams wrote: > I find it confusing that either CVE is still listed in the security > tracker at all. > > When a CVE bug is closed as invalid or illogical, why isn't the CVE > also deleted or removed? Leaving it as "vulnerable but unimportant" is > erroneou

Re: pilot-qof & dpkg-cross reports in PTS

2010-05-15 Thread Raphael Geissert
Neil Williams wrote: > On Sat, 15 May 2010 15:20:23 +0200 > Florian Weimer wrote: >> I suppose the export script needs to skip issues which are marked as >> unimportant. Yes, that seems to be the reason why the PTS says there are 76 unfixed issues affecting php5. > This CVE isn't unimportant,

Re: pilot-qof & dpkg-cross reports in PTS

2010-05-15 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 15 May 2010 15:20:23 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Neil Williams: > > > I don't see the same problem with my other packages' PTS pages, just > > these two: > > > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dpkg-cross.html > > This is caused by an unimportant issue, it seems: > >

Re: pilot-qof & dpkg-cross reports in PTS

2010-05-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Neil Williams: > I don't see the same problem with my other packages' PTS pages, just > these two: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dpkg-cross.html This is caused by an unimportant issue, it seems: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/p