On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 05:15:47PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 06:43:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > The M4 is almost ready. Please wait a few more days (when you've waited
> > this long, it'll be nothing ;).
>
> How 'bout M5? ;)
Be sure that after I get M4 .deb uploa
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 06:43:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> The M4 is almost ready. Please wait a few more days (when you've waited
> this long, it'll be nothing ;).
How 'bout M5? ;)
Mike Stone
On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 08:33:13PM -0500, Chris Mazuc wrote:
> It seems that this is the email for the maintainer of the mozilla package.
> The package in potato is currently over 7 months old, and this is
> unacceptable for a piece of software that is currently in fluid development.
> For this rea
On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 20:33:13 -0500, Chris Mazuc wrote:
> I wish to take over as packager for mozilla,
Several people are currently working on getting up to date mozilla packages;
their current work can be found on va.debian.org in ~joy/mozilla . Please
get in touch with Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 16:16:03 -0800, Brent A. Fulgham wrote:
> I noticed that our most recent mozilla build is circa Oct 1998.
That was the last time it built on a slink system, before the switch to Gtk
as the standard GUI library (which required a newer Gtk than slink had).
> I plan on attemp
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 04:16:03PM -0800, Brent A. Fulgham wrote:
> I noticed that our most recent mozilla build is circa Oct 1998.
>
> I plan on attempting to build this beast, and was wondering if anyone
> objects if I do a Non-Maintainer Upload if I manage to build it?
As I see it, it is up fo
J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> This morning, I uploaded a mozilla (latest tarball) compiled with the fixed
> libc6 and libstdc++2.9. It no longer dumps core immediately after startup,
> and should be somewhat usable again (it's still alpha code of course). It is
> marked Maintainer: Debian QA group .
J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\) wrote:
> When that happens, can I close these bugs rather than mark them Severity:
> fixed? If not, who has the authority to close them?
I'd say that anyone on this list can act as maintainer for orphaned packages.
Richard Braakman
On Fri, Sep 25, 1998 at 04:20:59PM +, Stephen Zander wrote:
> Speaking of mozilla, I see it's currently being maintained by the QA
> group.
Correct. It was orphaned, and I did a build of the latest tarball (as I
think mozilla is an important piece of free software of which Debian should
includ
9 matches
Mail list logo
