Re: libc4 is still listed as withdrawn

2000-08-08 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 09:36:19PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > - I've read the discussion of bug #24334 that it was impossible to build > libc4 in hamm... Hmm, I thought someone closed all the libc4 bug reports a year or more ago. (I actually saved them all in a text file here, if anybody wants

Re: libc4 is still listed as withdrawn

2000-08-06 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 09:36:19PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > - It's two major versions older than current libc6. > - It's a.out . > - It seems noone uses it and noone wants to maintain it. > - I've read the discussion of bug #24334 that it was impossible to build > libc4 in hamm... None of tho

Re: libc4 is still listed as withdrawn

2000-08-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 03:08:20AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > libc4 is still listed as withdrawn. There are discussions about removing > > libc5 from Debian. Isn't it time to remove libc4 from project/orphaned ? > > Why? - It's two major versions old

Re: libc4 is still listed as withdrawn

2000-08-06 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 03:08:20AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > libc4 is still listed as withdrawn. There are discussions about removing > libc5 from Debian. Isn't it time to remove libc4 from project/orphaned ? Why? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>