Re: doc-rfc package

2003-04-15 Thread Joey Hess
Martin Quinson wrote: > Yes I am. Vorlon proposed to sponsor me, but I guess he wouldn't mind if you > sponsor me. The most problematic problem with doc-rfc is > #92810: doc-rfc: license is not DFSG-free > I'll let vorlon contact upstream and search for a solution to this problem > (that's a par

Re: doc-rfc package

2003-04-15 Thread Martin Quinson
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 01:34:03PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Martin Quinson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > here is the mail I made one week ago to vorlon stating that I did repackage > > doc-rfc, closing most of its bugs on the way. I'm resending this to > > debian-qa because I'm affraid that someone

Re: doc-rfc package

2003-04-14 Thread Joey Hess
Martin Quinson wrote: > Hello, > > here is the mail I made one week ago to vorlon stating that I did repackage > doc-rfc, closing most of its bugs on the way. I'm resending this to > debian-qa because I'm affraid that someone else dupplicate this work... > > Could someone please comment on this

Re: doc-rfc package

2003-04-14 Thread Martin Quinson
Forwarded message from mquinson - Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:45:05 +0200 To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: doc-rfc package [...] Ok, I finnaly found my previous work on this package on an old and forgotten computer, and continue