hi Soren,
On Tue Jan 7, 2025 at 3:11 AM CET, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Serafeim,
>
> On Tuesday, November 26, 2024 3:08:26 PM MST Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas
> wrote:
> > my bad. this fails because feather-wallet is not installed and presumably
> > you've not enabled autopkgtest in sbuild (which wo
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 08:22:22PM -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> There have been discussions about adding adequate to Salsa CI and run
> it by default as part of the piuparts job. If you are now preparing to
> have adequate by default in piuparts, then it would make sense to have
> it by default
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> hi Holger,
as you have addressed me here and...
> On Wed Jan 8, 2025 at 11:57 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > (actually adequate is run on many more binary packages on piuparts.d.o,
> > because
> > p.d.o is not only
> > two things: first, what is a "core component of Debian" is very much up to
> > debate, but I'd be quite surprised if anybody made the case that adequate
> > is.
>
> adequate is run on all 7 binary packages on piuparts.debian.org. I'm
> really
> curious whether this will blow up when piupa
hi Holger,
On Wed Jan 8, 2025 at 11:57 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 11:55:30PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > two things: first, what is a "core component of Debian" is very much up to
> > debate, but I'd be quite surprised if anybody made the case that ade
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 11:55:30PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> two things: first, what is a "core component of Debian" is very much up to
> debate, but I'd be quite surprised if anybody made the case that adequate is.
adequate is run on all 7 binary packages on piuparts.debian.
Wouter, thank you so much for this response. your message has motivated me to
change adequate to target gccgo (rather than golang-go, which is a couple of
years ahead), to extend the availability of adequate to more ports
On Wed Dec 18, 2024 at 9:34 PM CET, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed,
On Fri Dec 27, 2024 at 10:49 PM CET, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> hi Jonathan,
>
> On Thu Dec 12, 2024 at 3:36 PM CET, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
[..]
> > "likely in many ports too" is dancing around the fact that it *doesn't*
> > run on at least one port, hence Holger's complaint.
>
> which
Serafeim,
On Tuesday, November 26, 2024 3:08:26 PM MST Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> my bad. this fails because feather-wallet is not installed and presumably
> you've not enabled autopkgtest in sbuild (which would have the side effect of
> installing it). I didn't catch this because, I've
hi Jonathan,
On Thu Dec 12, 2024 at 3:36 PM CET, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed Dec 11, 2024 at 10:57 PM GMT, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > I'd like to discuss this with a focus on general principles, and only
> > discuss specifics (adequate, golang) to the extent that it helps
> > re
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:57:14PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> [forking to -devel]
>
> On Wed Dec 11, 2024 at 11:15 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > > > On Sat Dec 7, 2024 at 5:15 AM CET, Paul Wis
On Wed Dec 11, 2024 at 10:57 PM GMT, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
I'd like to discuss this with a focus on general principles, and only
discuss specifics (adequate, golang) to the extent that it helps
reason about general principles.
That's going to be pretty hard, because the scenario y
Hi,
> [forking to -devel]
>
> On Wed Dec 11, 2024 at 11:15 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > > > On Sat Dec 7, 2024 at 5:15 AM CET, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > > Probably adequate is the logical place for this test, but ade
[forking to -devel]
On Wed Dec 11, 2024 at 11:15 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > > On Sat Dec 7, 2024 at 5:15 AM CET, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > Probably adequate is the logical place for this test, but adequate
> > > does
hi Holger, thanks for the feedback.
On Wed Dec 11, 2024 at 11:15 AM CET, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > > Probably adequate is the logical place for this test, but adequate
> > > doesn't build/run on ports architectures since
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:38:57PM +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > Probably adequate is the logical place for this test, but adequate
> > doesn't build/run on ports architectures since it moved to golang,
> > so piuparts should probably keep its tests on those arches until
> > adequat
hi Paul, thanks for the feedback. please see comments inline
On Sat Dec 7, 2024 at 5:15 AM CET, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-10-27 at 00:43 +0200, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
>
> > it seems to me that it'd be useful to write down some criteria to use as
> > guidance on how to decide wher
On Sun, 2024-10-27 at 00:43 +0200, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> it seems to me that it'd be useful to write down some criteria to use as
> guidance on how to decide where new checks should be implemented, to avoid
> duplication.
Checks that can only happen after install such as cross-pack
hi Soren, thanks for feedback!
On Mon Nov 25, 2024 at 11:49 PM CET, Soren Stoutner wrote:
[..]
> The sbuild page has recently been edited to handle the new unshare backend.
> The current version of the adequate code on the page is as follows:
>
> ## run adequate(1) and fail upon policy errors. D
On Wednesday, November 13, 2024 4:09:28 PM MST Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas
wrote:
> On Tue Nov 12, 2024 at 4:12 AM CET, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > In addition to adding an adequate Salsa CI job, you might also consider
> > updating the .sbuildrc example to contain the necessary information to
also
hi Soren,
On Tue Nov 12, 2024 at 4:12 AM CET, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 5, 2024 3:41:59 PM MST Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > I'm fine with adding a dedicated adequate job, if you feel strongly about
> > this.
>
> In addition to adding an adequate Salsa CI job, you might
On Tuesday, November 5, 2024 3:41:59 PM MST Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> I'm fine with adding a dedicated adequate job, if you feel strongly about
> this.
In addition to adding an adequate Salsa CI job, you might also consider
updating the .sbuildrc example to contain the necessary inform
On Tue Nov 5, 2024 at 10:45 PM CET, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>
> On Tue Nov 5, 2024 at 10:09 PM CET, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > On Tue Nov 5, 2024 at 2:50 PM CET, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > [..]
> > that's a great idea! technically, piuparts can run adequate but it's
> > disabled in
>
Hi,
On Tue Nov 5, 2024 at 10:09 PM CET, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> hi Diederik, thanks for your suggestions :)
You're welcome :)
> On Tue Nov 5, 2024 at 2:50 PM CET, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> [..]
> > Why not create a Salsa CI job and add it to the default pipeline?
> > I think most pe
hi Diederik, thanks for your suggestions :)
On Tue Nov 5, 2024 at 2:50 PM CET, Diederik de Haas wrote:
[..]
> Why not create a Salsa CI job and add it to the default pipeline?
> I think most people who use Salsa's CI use the default pipeline, so this
> seems like a very low friction way of getting
On Mon Nov 4, 2024 at 2:21 PM CET, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Nov 2024, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > > Or maybe it would help if adequate could be run in a debusine task. We
> > > already have tasks to run lintian and piuparts but we are lacking one for
> > > adequate.
> >
> > t
hi Raphael, thanks for your reply.
On Mon Nov 4, 2024 at 2:21 PM CET, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 01 Nov 2024, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > > Or maybe it would help if adequate could be run in a debusine task. We
> > > already have tasks to run lintian and piuparts but we
Hello,
On Fri, 01 Nov 2024, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> > Or maybe it would help if adequate could be run in a debusine task. We
> > already have tasks to run lintian and piuparts but we are lacking one for
> > adequate.
>
> thanks for the pointer to debusine. however it seems to be mean
On Tue Oct 29, 2024 at 5:39 PM CET, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> > One of the strengths of lintian and piuparts is a lot of people run them
> > each time they build a package. Adequate needing the package to be installed
> > makes it har
hi,
> On 2024-10-27 7 h 16 p.m., Richard Lewis wrote:
> > "Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas" writes:
> >
> >> hi lintian and piuparts folks! relatively new maintainer of adequate(1)
> >> here.
> >
> >> it seems to me that it'd be useful to write down some criteria to use as
> >> guidance on how to
Hello,
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> One of the strengths of lintian and piuparts is a lot of people run them
> each time they build a package. Adequate needing the package to be installed
> makes it harder to integrate in that workflow.
>
> Maybe if it was a feature in s
On 2024-10-27 7 h 16 p.m., Richard Lewis wrote:
"Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas" writes:
hi lintian and piuparts folks! relatively new maintainer of adequate(1) here.
No-one replied so i thought i'd have a go, but i have no role in any of
this, just a user who has also tried to understand these
32 matches
Mail list logo
