Re: Unbuildable packages

2003-10-30 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Andrew Pollock wrote: > I'm hesitant to package up a new upstream version of something that I have > no knowledge of (and probably no interest in, or I'd have adopted it). I > may end up making matters worse for the QA group overall, which is the > last thing that I want to do. In that case,

Re: Unbuildable packages

2003-10-26 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 11:46:39PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 06:46:41AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > As I mentioned recently[1], I'm working my way through the list of > > packages at http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html and uploading them with the > > Maintainer f

Re: Unbuildable packages

2003-10-26 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 06:46:41AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > As I mentioned recently[1], I'm working my way through the list of > packages at http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html and uploading them with the > Maintainer field set to the QA group. As Matthew Palmer suggested[2], I'm > also attemp