Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2004-01-05 Thread Igor Genibel
* Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-05 10:20:44 +0100]: > Yes I know but I could not do anything while my gpg key is not validated > by keyring maintainers. s/could not/cannot/ sorry -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfa

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2004-01-05 Thread Igor Genibel
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-04 16:54:08 +]: > Many people want developer.php to work properly, so I'm running the > DDPO cron jobs as my user now (temporarily until Igor enables them > again). Yes I know but I could not do anything while my gpg key is not validated by key

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2004-01-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-31 20:21]: > Hmm, I just realized that if klecker stays restricted, we'll have to > move qa (or at least mia) to another host. What requirements does qa have? weasel said debcheck needs php4, quite a bit of hd space and much RAM. We also need Apache and cron jo

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2004-01-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-04 16:54]: > 12 * * * * ($HOME/process-index.pl /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/index.db > /org/bugs.debian.org/etc/indices/sources > $HOME/public_html/bugs.txt) > */15 * * * * nice -15 /org/qa.debian.org/data/ddpo/ddpo.bug Does this really fit together? Is README.p

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2004-01-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-02 10:43]: > > developer.php is not working correctly. I assume this is because the > > FTP Source and Packages files are not being updated. weasel, can you > > remove the old ons and start your cron job again? Everyone, can you > > Ok, I update the FTP files.

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2004-01-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-31 15:14]: > developer.php is not working correctly. I assume this is because the > FTP Source and Packages files are not being updated. weasel, can you > remove the old ons and start your cron job again? Everyone, can you Ok, I update the FTP files. Igor, do

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2004-01-01 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-16 07:29]: > Please send a ping to debian-admin so that klecker actually receives > mail for qa.debian.org. James enabled mail again. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:21:32PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Hmm, I just realized that if klecker stays restricted, we'll have to > move qa (or at least mia) to another host. Ideally all of qa. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-31 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Hmm, I just realized that if klecker stays restricted, we'll have to move qa (or at least mia) to another host. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:14:17PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > All files, both in CVS and in /org/qa.debian.org, have been checked > now (again) by various people, at listed in weasel's files. CVS has > been restored by Joey, but he cannot fix DNS (for mail) so I'll send > another mail to -ad

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-31 Thread Martin Michlmayr
All files, both in CVS and in /org/qa.debian.org, have been checked now (again) by various people, at listed in weasel's files. CVS has been restored by Joey, but he cannot fix DNS (for mail) so I'll send another mail to -admin now. Many people have complained that developer.php is not working co

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-21 Thread Igor Genibel
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-21 10:36:48 +0100]: > * Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-18 18:32]: > > That leaves us with the wml, the bts, wnpp, and mia. tbm, you did > > review those, right? > > Yes, I did; I marked this as done now. > > I think Igor checked ./wm

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-18 18:32]: > That leaves us with the wml, the bts, wnpp, and mia. tbm, you did > review those, right? Yes, I did; I marked this as done now. I think Igor checked ./wml/developer.wml, right? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-18 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:36:45AM +0100, Peter Palfrader écrivait: > > To make absolutely certain that we did not forget anything, I would like > > to propose the following: > > > > > > I have made a copy of /org/qa.debian.org on klecker and placed

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:36:45AM +0100, Peter Palfrader écrivait: > To make absolutely certain that we did not forget anything, I would like > to propose the following: > > > I have made a copy of /org/qa.debian.org on klecker and placed it in > /org/home/weasel/possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa.

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-17 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:57:05PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr écrivait: > > Let's restore qa.d.o. I have checked CVS and it looks okay. However, > > So where are we ? I'm still waiting for the MX DNS entry in order to have > a fully working PTS ... >

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-16 07:29]: > PTS is checked, ddpo is check, the rest is probably also checked, > isn't it ? Sorry, I wanted to check whether the files in klecker:/org/qa.debian.org correspond to CVS. I have done this now, and mailed -admin. -- Martin Michlmayr [EM

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:57:05PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr écrivait: > Let's restore qa.d.o. I have checked CVS and it looks okay. However, So where are we ? I'm still waiting for the MX DNS entry in order to have a fully working PTS ... PTS is checked, ddpo is check, the rest is probably also

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > > Mine look OK, but there's no point in me enabling them until, > respectively, people.debian.org, lintian.debian.org, and /cvs/qa are > back up. Definitely. Any timescale for people.debian.org/~ ? Kind regards Andreas. -- Sie schaffen eine

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-12 09:38]: > Mine look OK, but there's no point in me enabling them until, > respectively, people.debian.org, lintian.debian.org, and /cvs/qa are > back up. Right, same with mine (but for BTS LDAP). -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-12 Thread Igor Genibel
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-12 20:22:38 +1100]: > * Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-12 10:10]: > > If someone could give me an extract of the code from oldgluck I > > could check and validate/invalidate it. > > Try http://www.cyrius.com/tmp/qa.tar.gz Thanks. I have

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:57:05PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Also, can people who run QA cronjobs please check them and enable them > if they are okay (people in the "qa" unix group have access to klecker). > Actually, I tried enabling my cronjobs and it didn't work. I'll ask > -admin about

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-12 10:10]: > If someone could give me an extract of the code from oldgluck I > could check and validate/invalidate it. Try http://www.cyrius.com/tmp/qa.tar.gz -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-12 Thread Igor Genibel
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-12 17:57:05 +1100]: > Let's restore qa.d.o. I have checked CVS and it looks okay. However, > I'd appreciate it if maintainers could check their own code; in > particular, I'm talking about: > >data/debcheck >data/ddpo >pts/ >wml/de

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

2003-12-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:57:05PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr écrivait: > Let's restore qa.d.o. I have checked CVS and it looks okay. However, > I'd appreciate it if maintainers could check their own code; in > particular, I'm talking about: > >data/debcheck >data/ddpo >pts/ >wml/de