Re: Removal suggestion: perlftlib

2008-07-25 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
reassign 279824 ftp.debian.org retitle 279824 RM: perlftlib -- RoQA; buggy, orphaned thanks On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 08:22:50PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:28:33PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > perlftlib can be removed, I've sp

Re: Removal suggestion: perlftlib

2008-07-25 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:28:33PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > perlftlib can be removed, I've sponsored the last package build-depending > > on it recently and it's coupled to freetype 1, which won't be included > > in Lenny. > > defoma still recommends it. Has

Re: Removal suggestion: perlftlib

2008-07-23 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:28:33PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > perlftlib can be removed, I've sponsored the last package build-depending > on it recently and it's coupled to freetype 1, which won't be included > in Lenny. defoma still recommends it. Has someone verified that this can be dro

Re: Removal suggestion: sanduhr

2007-07-15 Thread Paul Wise
On 7/16/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a gtk+1.2 application that has seen no upstream activity since 2004; it has 22 active users according to popcon, and there doesn't appear to be anything I would describe as a gtk+2.0 alarm clock in the archive, but it's one of only tw

Re: Removal suggestion: sanduhr

2007-07-15 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Sun Jul 15, 2007 at 15:33:27 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Should sanduhr be removed from unstable? seconded, even so it has 175 users according popcon. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Re: removal suggestion for openmosix from testing

2005-03-29 Thread Stephen Frost
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > i am not sure if i overlooked your answer to my last mail. Is there anything > we > can help on #232810? As we are going to freeze realy soon now (looks like both > ends of the toolchain are fixed by now), i fear that openmosix will be > dropped

Re: removal suggestion for openmosix from testing

2004-09-04 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > question about a removal from testing: > > > > > > openmosix > > > > > > It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer. > > > > Actually, I was working on that al

Re: removal suggestion for openmosix from testing

2004-08-21 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Stephen Frost wrote: > * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > question about a removal from testing: > > > > openmosix > > > > It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer. > > Actually, I was working on that already (well, that issue was fixed, I > was t

Re: Removal suggestion

2004-07-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-18 11:55]: [libflux0] > QA : it seems that the maintainer is MIA. Maybe we should orphaned > this package. He said this package can be removed from unstable. I'll do so later. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Removal suggestion

2004-07-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-18 11:55]: > QA : it seems that the maintainer is MIA. Maybe we should orphaned > this package. I've contacted him, thanks. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]