On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 10:22:29PM -0800, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> I noticed a discrepancy of the uscan @ANY_VERSION@ substitute string on
> UDD and locally on my bookworm system.
That's because UDD is running on bullseye, not on bookworm, with
bullseye-backports' version of devscripts (which really re
Xiyue Deng writes:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed a discrepancy of the uscan @ANY_VERSION@ substitute string on
> UDD and locally on my bookworm system. For example, for magit-popup,
> UDD reports error[1] while testing locally it worked for me. On further
> inspection, it turns out that the @ANY_VERSION@
Yes I was looking only for package names for now. :)
This seems exactly what I want.
Thank you very much!
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Matthieu Caneill
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Pavlos wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Not sure if this is the place to ask but is there a bett
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Pavlos wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Not sure if this is the place to ask but is there a better api for the
> information provided here
> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=vim ?
> I want to search exact or similar packages based on name and add this
> inf
Re: Bart Martens 2013-01-28 <20130128212932.gb3...@master.debian.org>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:06:32PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
> > Host apgdiff.startnet.biz also gives the same result. Question is:
> > Why do you query apgdiff.startnet.biz? When i apt-get source the
> > package, my watch file
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:29:32PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:06:32PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
> > Host apgdiff.startnet.biz also gives the same result. Question is:
> > Why do you query apgdiff.startnet.biz? When i apt-get source the
> > package, my watch files looks
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:06:32PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
> Host apgdiff.startnet.biz also gives the same result. Question is:
> Why do you query apgdiff.startnet.biz? When i apt-get source the
> package, my watch files looks like this:
> skainz@zidd-104:~/tmp/apgdiff-1.4/debian$ cat watch
> ver
Am 2013-01-28 21:55, schrieb Bart Martens:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:40:22PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
Trying to fix some watch files, i got a bit confused:
Looking at http://qa.debian.org/watch/uscan-errors.txt (dated
2012-01-28, as i can see here: http://qa.debian.org/watch/ ), i see
e.g the
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:40:22PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
> Trying to fix some watch files, i got a bit confused:
> Looking at http://qa.debian.org/watch/uscan-errors.txt (dated
> 2012-01-28, as i can see here: http://qa.debian.org/watch/ ), i see
> e.g the following line:
> apgdiff 2.4-1 : fail
Hi Rodolfo,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:34:58PM +0100, "Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)" wrote:
> Some days ago I uploaded a new version of wmaker (0.95.4-1) package [1] to
> experimental.
> [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wmaker.html
>
> The PTS web interface shows this package in the "patch-track
Excellent, thank you for most helpful links and directions. I'll start
digging and hopefully produce results as soon as possible.
Regards,
--
Damir Andrasevic
dandr...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Damir Andrasevic wrote:
>
>> Ou
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Damir Andrasevic wrote:
> Out of the technical skills that I possess and are significant to the
> subject matter, most useful would probably be some degree of C/C++
> programming, Python scripting and a good degree of networking
> knowledge. Something else that's
Hi Paul,
Your colleague Bart Martens answered one part of my questions, but
your answer will surely make it easier for me to put myself on the
right tracks. Thank you on the helpful links, will start digging in
them immediately.
Out of the technical skills that I possess and are significant to th
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Damir Andrasevic wrote:
> I am among others, user of Debian, so I would like to help out and
> give back my share to the community (and also learn something new
> along the way, off course).
> I have wandered around Debian web and given my present expertise I
> fee
> This package has "needs sponsor = no" at mentors.
> http://mentors.debian.net/packages/index
>
> Can you find an example with "needs sponsor = yes" ?
No, I can't. I've just browsed many updated packages prepared for unstable and
marked as "needs sponsor = yes". All of them have related todo i
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:38:32PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> > The PTS only looks at the unstable suite of mentors, I have a
> > half-completed patch to expand that to all the suites though.
>
> Oh, I didn't know this. I thought it shows also packages for experimental.
>
> >>> But now there is n
And what about integrating this feature to http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi ?
Should I post a bug report through qa.debian.org pseudo-package or do
something else?
2012-08-20 11:09, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago PTS checked http://mentors.debian.net/ for new source packages
> which were w
> The PTS only looks at the unstable suite of mentors, I have a
> half-completed patch to expand that to all the suites though.
Oh, I didn't know this. I thought it shows also packages for experimental.
>>> But now there is no such item. What happened?
>
> Sounds like a bug, which package?
Acco
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Some time ago PTS checked http://mentors.debian.net/ for new source packages
>> which were waiting for a sponsor. If new version of source package available
>> an appropriate item was added in todo section on package page.
Nothing changed
On 20/08/12 at 11:09 +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago PTS checked http://mentors.debian.net/ for new source packages
> which were waiting for a sponsor. If new version of source package available
> an appropriate item was added in todo section on package page.
>
> But now there is
Hi again,
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 10:34 +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:43:57AM +, Regis Boudin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I might be completely wrong, but...
> >
> > Playing around with dependencies trees, I noticed there are quite a few
> > obsolete Conflicts fie
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:04:46PM -, Regis Boudin wrote:
> On Tue, March 6, 2007 11:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 06/03/07 at 07:34 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> >> I think that it's difficult to find an approach for an efficient
> >> all-packages review about old/obsolete confli
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:23PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/03/07 at 07:34 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> > I think that it's difficult to find an approach for an efficient
> > all-packages review about old/obsolete conflicts.
>
> it might be interesting to talk to the E
Regis Boudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No actual result at the moment. I was playing with something not really
> related and noticed the impressive number on conflicts in the
> distribution, with many easily identifiable as very old packages. I just
> preferred asking if it was worth looking a
On Tue, March 6, 2007 11:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/03/07 at 07:34 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
>> I think that it's difficult to find an approach for an efficient
>> all-packages review about old/obsolete conflicts.
>
> it might be interesting to talk to the EDOS people about that. It
Hi,
On 06/03/07 at 07:34 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> I think that it's difficult to find an approach for an efficient
> all-packages review about old/obsolete conflicts.
it might be interesting to talk to the EDOS people about that. It's
possible that their tools could help to find obsolete conf
On Tue, March 6, 2007 09:34, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> great, are these results published somewhere? Trivial obsoleted conflicts
> might
> be removed via a wishlist bug.
No actual result at the moment. I was playing with something not really
related and noticed the impressive number on conflicts
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:43:57AM +, Regis Boudin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I might be completely wrong, but...
>
> Playing around with dependencies trees, I noticed there are quite a few
> obsolete Conflicts fields in the archive. Would it be worth starting a
> bit of cleanup after Etch is relea
Hi,
On Tue, March 6, 2007 06:34, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 01:43 +, Regis Boudin wrote:
>> Playing around with dependencies trees, I noticed there are quite a few
>> obsolete Conflicts fields in the archive. Would it be worth starting a
>> bit of cleanup after Etch is release
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 01:43 +, Regis Boudin wrote:
> Playing around with dependencies trees, I noticed there are quite a few
> obsolete Conflicts fields in the archive. Would it be worth starting a
> bit of cleanup after Etch is released ? I think having the archive
> cleaner from this point of
Moin!
* Glidounet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050501 11:37]:
> I'm french guy interested on Debian,
> I wanna know if a special mail adress is gave (by Debian or other) to follow
> the differents diffusion list and to report documentations and help I can
> give ...
> Thanks a lot for answering and sor
Thank you for consulting our Technical Support Service.
The E-mail address you are trying to reach has been changed. Please use the
link below for any Technical support request.
For Hercules users:
http://ts.hercules.com/
For Thrustmaster Users"
http://ts.thrustmaster.com/
Please note that a s
This question is appropriate for debian-user, debian-boot only handles the
base install (which doesn't include X). It is best to send to only one list
first rather than cross-posting to multiple. I'm forwarding to
debian-user, and I can suggest the package 'xf86setup' and the program
XF86Setup.
-
33 matches
Mail list logo
